Search for: "State v. Downs"
Results 9041 - 9060
of 40,863
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 Dec 2019, 10:53 am
Clement suggested that the case is “straightforward,” telling the justices that the ban should be struck down because there is “no historical analogue” for this kind of rule. [read post]
2 Dec 2019, 6:00 am
That is, if a suspect at any time prior to or during the questioning states that he wants to consult with an attorney, “the interrogation must cease until an attorney is present. [read post]
2 Dec 2019, 2:30 am
On Wednesday 4 December 2019 the Court will hand down judgment MacDonald & Anor v Carnbroe Estates Ltd (Scotland). [read post]
1 Dec 2019, 4:05 pm
On the same day Steyn J handed down judgment after a meaning trial in the case of James v Saunders [2019] EWHC 3265 (QB). [read post]
30 Nov 2019, 10:01 am
" Ward v. [read post]
28 Nov 2019, 9:59 am
State 764 So2d 871, and Andreu v. [read post]
28 Nov 2019, 4:42 am
In one of the most – if not the most – hotly anticipated and significant trade mark cases of the year, the EU Advocate General, Evgeni Tanchev, on 16 October 2019, handed down his Opinion in the Sky v Skykick case, following a reference by the English High Court to the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU). [read post]
28 Nov 2019, 4:42 am
In one of the most – if not the most – hotly anticipated and significant trade mark cases of the year, the EU Advocate General, Evgeni Tanchev, on 16 October 2019, handed down his Opinion in the Sky v Skykick case, following a reference by the English High Court to the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU). [read post]
28 Nov 2019, 4:42 am
In one of the most – if not the most – hotly anticipated and significant trade mark cases of the year, the EU Advocate General, Evgeni Tanchev, on 16 October 2019, handed down his Opinion in the Sky v Skykick case, following a reference by the English High Court to the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU). [read post]
28 Nov 2019, 4:42 am
In one of the most – if not the most – hotly anticipated and significant trade mark cases of the year, the EU Advocate General, Evgeni Tanchev, on 16 October 2019, handed down his Opinion in the Sky v Skykick case, following a reference by the English High Court to the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU). [read post]
27 Nov 2019, 1:22 pm
In 2015, in Avneri v. [read post]
27 Nov 2019, 7:00 am
Investment Policy Committee v. [read post]
27 Nov 2019, 6:43 am
The district court dismissed the case from the outset, but the Court of Appeals reinstates the claim, ruling that the plaintiff has sufficiently alleged the officer hit him without justification, and that he did so in retaliation for the inmate's free speech.The case is Fabricio v. [read post]
27 Nov 2019, 3:21 am
” For the ABA Journal, Erwin Chemerinsky previews New York State Rifle & Pistol Association Inc. v. [read post]
27 Nov 2019, 2:52 am
The written law relied on was S4(3) of the Societies Act, which states that the Registrar may refuse to register a society if inter alia its name is identical to that of an existing society. [read post]
26 Nov 2019, 9:01 pm
Yet Supreme Court cases—especially the 1991 ruling in Gregory v. [read post]
26 Nov 2019, 1:58 pm
Earlier this month, the Ontario Divisional Court released its decision (by the Court) in Canadian Federation of Students v. [read post]
26 Nov 2019, 1:38 pm
See this post.Despite history and widespread usage of "manner of execution" and "method of execution" as synonymous, Judge Chutkan decided that "manner" includes all the details of the state's procedure, down to such things as catheter insertion.If upheld, that would be a neat little Catch-22 preventing enforcement of the federal death penalty in many states. [read post]
26 Nov 2019, 8:50 am
The FTC, too, notes that "[s]pecial deference is paid to a trial court's credibility findings," as the Ninth Circuit stated in Exxon Co. v. [read post]
26 Nov 2019, 7:59 am
The US Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit affirmed the trial court decision to uphold the contribution limits without applying the Supreme Court precedent in Randall v. [read post]