Search for: "State v. Law" Results 9041 - 9060 of 173,875
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
5 May 2010, 7:14 am by Tarunabh Khaitan
The full text of the landmark judgment of the Supreme Court in the case of Selvi v State of Karnataka is available here. [read post]
8 Dec 2017, 9:23 am by Matthew L.M. Fletcher
Here: The National Indian Law Library added new content to the Indian Law Bulletins on 12/7/17. [read post]
18 Aug 2011, 4:55 am
If you want to read about a large number of issues in federal criminal law in one place, you should check out United States v. [read post]
24 Jul 2012, 12:43 pm by Donald Childress
The following response in our symposium on Kiobel v. [read post]
25 Mar 2012, 12:00 am by SupremeCourtHaiku
Plea deal rejected Counsel wrong about the law State must reoffer Opinion:  pdf  html [read post]
18 Aug 2009, 6:00 am
Hiestand lost money or property "as a result of" the defendants' alleged violation of that law. [read post]
23 Oct 2007, 4:45 am
Labor Law § 240(1)The Second Department denied defendant's motion to dismiss a Labor Law § 240(1) cause of action, in Mentesana v Bernard Janowitz Constr. [read post]
26 Jan 2022, 3:20 pm
And if the Debt is Contested: “a testing of the insurer’s liability may take the form of a declaratory judgmentbrought in advance of the third party’s action or proceedings on garnishment following the trial of the third party’s action” Arizona Law       Certified Questions from the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit Benson, et al. v. [read post]
25 Jul 2012, 11:45 am by Bill Raftery
The Louisiana Constitution provides (Article V, Sections 4 & 6) Section 4. [read post]
30 Sep 2020, 2:21 pm by Unknown
United States Department of the Interior (IGRA)Tule Lake Committee v. [read post]
26 Jul 2010, 7:53 am by Antitrust Today
  Roughly half of the states have enacted laws contrary to the spirit of the Supreme Court’s 1977 decision in Illinois Brick v. [read post]
2 Feb 2016, 9:10 am by Associates and Bruce L. Scheiner
Taylor, Jan. 14, 2016, Washington State Supreme Court More Blog Entries: Samson v. [read post]
23 Jan 2007, 1:34 pm by Womenstake blog
The opinion narrowly interpreted the Medicaid law to require only that states pay some amount for medical care, even though the state knew it wasn’t paying enough for necessary services to actually be provided. [read post]
15 Jul 2011, 8:22 am by Eric
Summit Entertainment, which survived various state law claims in addition to a 512(f) claim. [read post]