Search for: "State v. Long" Results 9041 - 9060 of 45,839
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 May 2021, 3:26 pm by Matthew L.M. Fletcher
Daly (Tribal Sovereign Immunity; Religious Land Use and Institutionalized Persons Act)United States, Osage Minerals Council v. [read post]
17 Jan 2012, 4:34 pm by INFORRM
Ultimately the case turned on whether the interference was proportionate, and the Secretary’s decision had failed the requirements of the proportionality principle as summarised in Huang v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2007] 2 AC 167. [read post]
19 Aug 2013, 3:52 pm by Stephen Bilkis
So long as the evidence, the law, and the circumstances of a particular case, viewed in totality and as of the time of the representation, reveal that the attorney provided meaningful representation the constitutional requirement will have been met as was held in People v Baldi. [read post]
6 Mar 2018, 4:33 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Plaintiffs failed to show that the NTP defendants actively projected themselves into New York to engage in a sustained and substantial transaction of business within New York, thereby purposefully availing themselves of the privilege of conducting activities in New York so as to subject them to long-arm jurisdiction pursuant to CPLR 302(a)(1) (see Paterno v Laser Spine Inst., 24 NY3d 370 [2014]; Bloomgarden v Lanza, 143 AD3d 850 [2d Dept. 2016]). [read post]
27 May 2009, 10:51 am
Hunter-Seattle preserves this state discretion to centralize vast swathes of policy-making (university admissions, public employee benefits, etc) just so long as the state paints with a reasonably impartial brush. [read post]
14 Sep 2015, 3:19 pm
In that setting, the United States admitted that the judge's conduct was improper. [read post]
21 Aug 2014, 6:00 am by Yosie Saint-Cyr
This was the decision of the Federal Court of Appeal in the recent case, Canada (Human Rights Commission) v. [read post]
29 Feb 2016, 8:51 am by David Gans
 When the Supreme Court hands down its ruling in this Term’s blockbuster abortion case, the Justices should make clear that courts should not rubberstamp laws that deny women liberty, equality, and dignity.At issue in the case of Whole Woman’s Health v. [read post]
7 May 2024, 7:43 am by centerforartlaw
Source: USPTO  Rothschild moved to dismiss the complaint under the Second Circuit’s Rogers v. [read post]
29 Jan 2019, 9:08 am by John Elwood
We’re now in the middle of the Supreme Court’s nearly month-long midwinter hiatus between conferences. [read post]