Search for: "State v. Saide"
Results 9041 - 9060
of 57,117
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Dec 2020, 6:32 am
He said district courts can perform this analysis, although they could seek input from the State Department. [read post]
9 Dec 2020, 2:10 am
In this regard, the Court reasoned as follows:First, jurisprudence suggesting that the mental state of an alleged infringer was irrelevant usually concerned – people who did not know that the goods (containing the infringing sign) that they were selling or otherwise handling were not genuine from the trade mark proprietor rather than those who did not even know that a sign identical or similar to the trade mark existed on the goods at all. [read post]
8 Dec 2020, 4:07 pm
Rewriting the history of the DSM Directive – Part 1 by Julia Reda “EU Member States are currently grappling with the task of implementing the Directive on Copyright in the Digital Single Market (DSM Directive) into national law. [read post]
8 Dec 2020, 1:30 pm
Geske v. [read post]
8 Dec 2020, 1:01 pm
Health Secretary Matt Hancock said afterward that “we will look back on this day, V-Day, as a key moment in the fighback of this terrible disease. [read post]
8 Dec 2020, 10:58 am
See Rothermel v Duncan. [read post]
8 Dec 2020, 10:55 am
Board of Education Should Have Said (2001) and What Roe v. [read post]
8 Dec 2020, 10:49 am
C. v. [read post]
8 Dec 2020, 10:01 am
In yesterday's Greenberg v. [read post]
8 Dec 2020, 7:28 am
As the Supreme Court has said, the Framers of the U.S. [read post]
8 Dec 2020, 6:28 am
Rewriting the history of the DSM Directive – Part 1 by Julia Reda “EU Member States are currently grappling with the task of implementing the Directive on Copyright in the Digital Single Market (DSM Directive) into national law. [read post]
8 Dec 2020, 5:01 am
That said, the courts’ long-standing practice is to defer to the State Department’s assessment. [read post]
8 Dec 2020, 4:06 am
(Pamela Samuelson’s Commentary on UMG v Augusto and Vernor v Autodesk) Vernor v Autodesk (EFF Amicus Brief in Key Case re First Sale and Contracts, Following UMG v Augusto) MDY v Blizzard (Justia) A Mixed Ninth Circuit Ruling in MDY v Blizzard: WoW Buyers Are Not Owners – But Glider Users Are not Copyright Infringers (EFF’s Commentary on MDY v Blizzard) Capitol Records v ReDigi (Wikipedia) Court’s… [read post]
8 Dec 2020, 4:00 am
" Further, said the Court, "... the mere assertion that a constitutional right is involved will not excuse the failure to pursue established administrative remedies that can provide the required relief. [read post]
8 Dec 2020, 12:00 am
" Further, said the Court, "... the mere assertion that a constitutional right is involved will not excuse the failure to pursue established administrative remedies that can provide the required relief. [read post]
7 Dec 2020, 3:46 pm
The question before the justices in Federal Republic of Germany v. [read post]
7 Dec 2020, 1:57 pm
On Tuesday, in Facebook v. [read post]
7 Dec 2020, 1:16 pm
In short, the NCD and Office of the NCD would resemble the structure of the Office of the United States Trade Representative, albeit with a smaller scale. [read post]
7 Dec 2020, 8:34 am
And, as that Court has said, this equal treatment is especially sensible in the internet era. [read post]
7 Dec 2020, 6:50 am
Denying in part her employer’s motion for summary judgment, the court also found fact disputes as to whether she could have performed her job responsibilities on a partial work-from-home schedule (Kande v. [read post]
