Search for: "v. Smith"
Results 9041 - 9060
of 16,217
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 Jul 2015, 5:38 pm
After then considering the fact that in Smith v. [read post]
17 Jun 2020, 9:00 pm
In Shelby County v. [read post]
14 Mar 2021, 7:24 pm
The standard set by the Ontario Court of Appeal in Crits v. [read post]
12 Nov 2012, 5:50 pm
Judgment Released: May 8, 2012 Link to Judgment The Ontario Court of Appeal dealt with an appeal where summary judgment had been granted by the Court below, prior to the release of Combined Air. [read post]
4 Jun 2018, 1:43 pm
From a liberal’s perspective, Justice Kennedy’s Lukumi “hostility” theory in Masterpiece Cakeshop seems like the ideal opinion: It seems too narrowly fact-based to endanger anti-discrimination laws yet almost custom-tailored (or -baked?) [read post]
21 Aug 2011, 11:43 am
Updating a long list of earlier ILB entries, which already include several by Fort Wayne Journal Gazette reporter Rebecca S.... [read post]
18 Feb 2015, 11:31 am
The development of good legal “vision” is becoming increasingly more difficult for young lawyers. [read post]
20 Jun 2007, 6:46 am
Here is the abstract: This paper addresses the sexual abuse of women in custody as a more contemporary manifestation of slavery and discusses the congruencies and the differences that exist between the sexual abuse of women in custody and slavery. [read post]
2 Apr 2010, 11:42 am
For those with access to Minnesota Rules of Court: Key Rules - Volume IIA - Federal - 2010, you will find a copy of the Complaint beginning on page 538 - 542. [read post]
29 Sep 2013, 1:20 pm
It is well settled that a defendant's statutory right to testify before the grand jury " must be scrupulously protected' " (People v Smith, 87 NY2d 715, 721, quoting People v Corrigan, 80 NY2d 326, 332). [read post]
22 Oct 2014, 4:20 am
(also captioned v. [read post]
14 Nov 2016, 3:36 pm
In these circumstances and absent an error of principle, an appellate court will be very cautious in differing from the judge's evaluation: see SmithKline Beecham's Patent [2006] RPC 323 at [38] per Lord Hoffmann; Halliburton Energy Services Inc v Smith International (North Sea) Ltd and anor [2006] EWCA Civ 1715 at [24] to [25] per Jacob LJ" 3. [read post]
17 Apr 2024, 6:00 am
Citing Matter of Asch v New York City Bd. [read post]
8 Jul 2018, 9:46 am
Smith and DJ Hellerstein. [read post]
9 Dec 2014, 9:07 am
Alvarez v. [read post]
27 Jun 2023, 6:15 am
Of course, such decisions can and this one is indeed going to be appealed--which is also a safe assumption with respect to an even higher-profile recent FRAND ruling by the same court, Mr Justice Marcus Smith's Optis v. [read post]
1 Nov 2020, 11:48 am
United States v. [read post]
17 Apr 2024, 6:00 am
Citing Matter of Asch v New York City Bd. [read post]
16 Mar 2015, 4:56 am
In Smith v. [read post]
23 Feb 2018, 2:25 pm
That was a huge deal in 1986 because Congress understandably assumed after Smith v. [read post]
