Search for: "DOE"
Results 9061 - 9080
of 546,377
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 Jul 2011, 1:46 pm
Researchers know that marijuana does impair a person’s ability to drive but currently 35 states have no formal standard and instead rely fully on the judgment of the police. [read post]
20 Dec 2010, 4:07 am
That the driver made the “wrong choice” and failed to avoid an accident does not eliminate the emergency doctrine as a defense. [read post]
13 Aug 2009, 7:03 pm
So, how long does it take to get divorced? [read post]
29 Jul 2010, 8:50 am
Does the same reasoning apply to non-lawyers? [read post]
5 Oct 2009, 4:30 am
"evidence that plaintiff contacted defendant concerning his dispute with Utica National does not establish the existence of an attorney-client relationship absent further evidence of an "explicit undertaking [by defendant] to perform a specific task" (Wei Cheng Chang v Pi, 288 AD2d 378, 380, lv denied 99 NY2d 501; see McGlynn v Gurda, 184 AD2d 980, appeal dismissed and lv denied 80 NY2d 988). [read post]
5 Jan 2010, 12:51 pm
This does not mean that the other parent has to provide information to the non-custodial parent, but rather that the non-custodial parent has the right to access said information. [read post]
26 Aug 2010, 10:57 am
While part of the initial process, the "approval" by the USCIS does not necessarily mean that the visa will be issued to the fiance later by the embassy or consulate in the fiance's home country. [read post]
10 Nov 2011, 11:26 am
To begin with, Defendant cannot maintain the Counter-Complaint under the fictitious name “John Doe” and be permitted to use his anonymity as both a sword and a shield. [read post]
29 Oct 2010, 9:12 am
Pa. 2009) (“The availability of an individual account claim under § 502(a)(2) [of ERISA] does not alleviate the concerns cited by numerous courts that have certified ERISA class actions pursuant to Rule 23(b)(1)(B) in situations where claims on behalf of the Plan are identical to those on behalf of an individual account. [read post]
17 Apr 2008, 9:13 am
And on a practical level, what raised this thought this morning was this story here in the New York Times about pension funds moving out of equities, because, while there is a certain apples and oranges aspect to any comparison between that issue and employee holdings of employer stock in defined contribution plans (in that pension funds are moving in this direction because of future liabilities related to pension plan payouts and not necessarily for the same reasons that an employee might not want… [read post]
2 Oct 2007, 3:27 am
"This case provides a good example of how Article 69 is used in practice and that the scope of European patents is governed by what is in the claim. . . and does not allow a patent holder to add aspects from the specification," comments Whymark. [read post]
6 Oct 2009, 8:06 am
Perhaps the attorney already does focus mostly on a couple of industries but hasn’t marketed that focus. [read post]
13 Jun 2011, 6:00 am
Supreme Court held that the Department of Transportation (DOT)’s Federal Motor Vehicle Safety Standard 208 (FMVSS 208) does not pre-empt a state tort lawsuit claiming an auto manufacturer negligently chose to install lap-only seatbelts in the rear seat instead of lap-and-shoulder belts, a choice allowed under the federal standard. [read post]
20 May 2007, 4:42 pm
New content itself does not take one to the top of the search engines. [read post]
9 Feb 2012, 10:30 pm
” The irony here is that the USPTO does not have registered trademark rights in its own name. [read post]
22 Jun 2014, 7:38 pm
Any as a Supreme Court justice or does it go away? [read post]
28 Aug 2012, 8:44 am
Does Prince Harry have a civil cause of action against the person(s) who shot the video? [read post]
20 Jul 2011, 8:46 am
If that’s true, why does my attorney want my sister’s husband to sign a Quit Claim deed? [read post]
18 Oct 2022, 4:25 am
So here is the test for our readers—does the photo in this blog show hurricane damage, and why? [read post]
19 Aug 2015, 7:12 am
The critical take away from this decision is that a change in work assignment does not necessarily occur each time that an employee is loaned to a borrowing employer. [read post]
