Search for: "DOE v. UNITED STATES" Results 9061 - 9080 of 44,302
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
25 Apr 2020, 8:01 am by Gregory B. Williams
Fossil Group, Inc., No. 18-233, 590 U.S. _____ (2020), the United States Supreme Court held that a plaintiff in a trademark infringement action, brought under 15 U.S.C. [read post]
25 Apr 2020, 5:33 am by Matthew Waxman, Samuel Weitzman
” In so doing, Roosevelt justified his actions “by virtue of the power and authority vested in me by the Constitution and laws of the United States, as President of the United States and Commander in Chief of the Army and Navy of the United States[.] [read post]
24 Apr 2020, 9:45 am by Paul Fling
This week, the United States Supreme Court may have made it considerably easier for a trademark owner to recover lost profits from a trademark infringer. [read post]
24 Apr 2020, 8:10 am by Scarlet Kim
Ange Samma, a 22-year-old green card holder from Burkina Faso, came to the United States seven years ago, when he was still a teenager. [read post]
24 Apr 2020, 7:42 am by Rachel Bercovitz
(For those who are interested, United States v. [read post]
24 Apr 2020, 3:54 am by Edith Roberts
At Bloomberg Law, Kimberly Robinson reports that the ruling in Barton “has made it harder for longtime green card holders with a criminal conviction to remain in the United States. [read post]
23 Apr 2020, 4:09 pm by Lisa Heinzerling
United States, narrowly construing the “waters of the United States” protected by the Clean Water Act.) [read post]
23 Apr 2020, 12:22 pm by Patent Litigation Group
[xxii]  As a result of the United States’ entry into World War II in December of 1941, the seller was unable to obtain an export permit for shipment into the United States and had been previously delayed due to repairs and war conditions. [read post]
23 Apr 2020, 11:49 am by Jonathan H. Adler
And I see nothing in the complaint that gives federal judges the power to oversee Detroit's schools in the name of the United States Constitution. [read post]
23 Apr 2020, 10:41 am by Peter Margulies
§ 1182(f) of the Immigration and Nationality Act (INA), which authorizes the president to bar entry of foreign nationals “detrimental to the interests of the United States”—the same provision that Trump used for his travel ban, which the Supreme Court upheld in Trump v. [read post]
23 Apr 2020, 8:01 am by Elliot Setzer
(c) This proclamation is not intended to, and does not, create any right or benefit, substantive or procedural, enforceable at law or in equity by any party against the United States, its departments, agencies, or entities, its officers, employees, or agents, or any other person. [read post]