Search for: "David C " Results 9061 - 9080 of 9,816
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
17 Jul 2011, 12:32 pm by Veronika Gaertner
The exercise of legislative competence by the European Union according to art. 81 (2) lit. c), (3) TFEU is governed by the principles of conferral, subsidiarity and proportionality. [read post]
24 Aug 2010, 9:17 am
" Other than ECUSA itself, the plaintiffs (petitioners) are all individuals, starting with Bishop C. [read post]
26 Oct 2023, 8:27 am by Amy Howe
The PTO denied Elster’s application, explaining that a federal trademark law, Section 2(c) of the Lanham Act, bars the registration of a trademark that uses the name of another living person unless that person has given permission. [read post]
28 May 2015, 12:00 am by Pietro Franzina
Regulation No 1346/2000 (the relevant ECJ judgments include: Susanne Staubitz-Schreiber [2006]; Eurofood IFSC [2006]; Deko Marty Belgium [2009]; SCT Industri [2009]; German Graphics [2009]; MG Probud [2010]; Interedil [2011]; Zaza Retail [2011]; Rastelli Davide [2011]; F-Tex SIA [2012]; ERSTE Bank Hungary [2012]; Ulf Kazimierz Radziejewski [2012]; Bank Handlowy [2012]; Grontimmo [2013]; Meliha Veli Mustafa [2013]; Ralph Schmid [2014]; Burgo Group [2014]; Nickel… [read post]
5 Dec 2007, 10:08 pm
Having likened the 3 Guantánamo matters argued before the U.S. [read post]
23 May 2018, 6:46 am by Joy Waltemath
“We agree with Justice Ginsburg that the Court’s decision in Epic Systems is ‘egregiously wrong,’” said Matthew C. [read post]
25 Nov 2013, 11:30 am by Terry Hart
” As we have explained, “[t]he economic philosophy behind the [Copyright] [C]lause … is the conviction that encouragement of individual effort by personal gain is the best way to advance public welfare through the talents of authors and inventors. [read post]
5 Jun 2009, 5:00 am
(IP finance) RIAA – Nesson seeks Supreme Court certiorari concerning rejection of bid to webcast proceedings in Joel Tenenbaum case (Excess Copyright) RIAA – Op Ed by RIAA General Counsel – Nesson more like P T Barnum than David (Ars Technica) RIAA – Jammie Thomas attorney requests all MediaSentry evidence barred in retrial (Ars Technica) (Ars Technica) RIAA – Last.fm, CBS respond to rumours of data shared with RIAA or music label (Ars… [read post]
18 Jan 2016, 9:01 pm by Joanna L. Grossman
And she filed a lawsuit asking to be named the sole custodian of “Baby C” (perhaps not a particular baby, but the one he allegedly did not want). [read post]
22 Apr 2022, 4:02 pm by INFORRM
CôtéDecision Date: September 27, 2019 The Supreme Court of Canada (SCC) offered guidance for the first time on the 2017 amendment to the Canada Evidence Act (CEA), which provided for greater protection to journalistic sources. [read post]
26 Jan 2014, 9:01 pm by Joanna L. Grossman
  Instead, the court gave the non-paternity its clear, bright-line intent, an approach for which it found support in a very similar case in California, Jhordan C. v. [read post]
11 Apr 2008, 2:36 am
"It is woefully deficient," said their lead counsel, David Barron, anassistant public advocate.The Rev. [read post]
9 Apr 2017, 4:33 pm by INFORRM
On the Information Law and Policy Centre blog Christina Angelopoulos, Lecturer in Intellectual Property Law at the University of Cambridge, has analysed the recent Opinion by AG Szpunar in case C-610/15, Stichting Brein v Ziggo. [read post]
23 Mar 2023, 4:00 am by AALL Spectrum
This submission is part of a column swap with the American Association of Law Libraries (AALL) bimonthly member magazine, AALL Spectrum. [read post]
22 Oct 2012, 8:00 am by McNabb Associates, P.C.
The Telegraph on October 21, 2012 released the following: “By Philip Sherwell As he strolled off the fairway with his scorecard at the 18th hole, the white-haired man in blue polo shirt and khaki shorts could have been just another relaxed late-afternoon golfer. [read post]
14 Jan 2019, 9:01 pm by Joanna L. Grossman
“[C]onsistent with the Act’s basic objective, that reason normally cannot consist simply of a claim that it is more expensive or less convenient to add pregnant women to the category of those (‘similar in their ability or inability to work’) whom the employer accommodates. [read post]