Search for: "English v. English"
Results 9061 - 9080
of 11,202
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 Oct 2010, 3:08 pm
-Gen. v Punch Ltd [2003] 1 AC 1046 at [87]-[88] in the Court of Appeal and at [95] in the House of Lords; and Jockey Club v Buffham [2003] QB 462 (Gray J). [read post]
21 Oct 2010, 10:15 am
V .R. [read post]
21 Oct 2010, 6:02 am
The Supreme Court found that English law governed. [read post]
20 Oct 2010, 11:24 pm
After this judgment it will be natural to infer that parties entering into agreements governed by English law will intend that effect be given to them. [read post]
20 Oct 2010, 8:47 pm
Here’s a very brief summary: In a long line of cases (such as Presbyterian Church in the United States v. [read post]
20 Oct 2010, 12:32 pm
(October 18, 2010) "The United States Supreme Court on October 6, 2010, heard oral argument in Connick v. [read post]
20 Oct 2010, 2:54 am
The Supreme Court has ruled that the pre-nuptial agreeement signed in the case of Radmacher -V- Garantino is enforceable and that it agreed that in the right case such agreements can have decisive or compelling weight. [read post]
20 Oct 2010, 2:18 am
Those looking for a clear statement that pre-nuptial agreements are akin to contracts in English law will be disappointed. [read post]
20 Oct 2010, 2:07 am
This is entirely in conformity with the principles set out by the House of Lords in American Cyanamid v. [read post]
19 Oct 2010, 4:01 am
This is only the third case in which such a finding has been made – the other two are Pfeifer v Austria (2007) 48 EHRR 175 and Petrina v Romania Judgment of 14 October 2008). [read post]
18 Oct 2010, 10:29 am
In relation to this latter point, the Court gave full treatment to the origins and scope of the section [by far the fullest treatment of the provision that this Kat has ever seen in an English decision]. [read post]
18 Oct 2010, 8:59 am
At Wednesday’s oral argument in Kasten v. [read post]
18 Oct 2010, 2:12 am
In Alstom, Bouygues v. [read post]
17 Oct 2010, 11:15 pm
Although this may, in substance, be the same test as that analysed in the English authorities it gives rise to a number of difficulties when the judge applied it to the facts. [read post]
17 Oct 2010, 1:04 pm
Nebraska and Roe v. [read post]
16 Oct 2010, 4:42 am
Mr Justice Gillen’s judgment in the case of Lee, Morrison and X v News Group Newspapers ([2010] NIQB 106) has now been made public. [read post]
15 Oct 2010, 4:07 am
Reference was made to the well known English case of Thomas v Newsgroup Newspapers Ltd [2001] EWCA Civ 1233. [read post]
14 Oct 2010, 10:10 am
How could I have slogged through Pennoyer v. [read post]
14 Oct 2010, 12:02 am
The Grand Chamber of the European Court of Human rights yesterday heard the conjoined applications in Von Hannover v Germany and Springer v Germany. [read post]
13 Oct 2010, 4:35 am
His Lordship applied the principle established in Freeport v Arnoldson [2007] E.C.R. [read post]
