Search for: "LARGE v. LARGE" Results 9061 - 9080 of 40,643
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 Sep 2010, 3:07 am
Creating new negotiating unitsErie County v PERB, Appellate Division, 247 A.D.2d 671The Erie County v PERB case suggests that PERB has become more flexible regarding splitting sheriff’s department employees into separate collective bargaining units.In Erie County Teamsters Local 264 represented a single large negotiating unit that included both Deputy Sheriff-criminal [“criminal deputies”] and Deputy Sheriff-officer [“officer deputies”]… [read post]
1 Mar 2012, 11:22 pm by Ilya Somin
There is actually a good deal of Supreme Court precedent on this point (the leading modern case is Village of Arlington Heights v. [read post]
15 Mar 2018, 4:45 am by alysondrake
Ada Kepley did not reapply for the bar until 1881, largely because she was focused into temperance reform. [read post]
16 Feb 2012, 1:44 pm
  So his scheme largely works.And it works on the federal side as well, at least in part. [read post]
11 May 2007, 7:02 am by John C. Schropp
In 2003, before the bankruptcy case was closed, Appellant John Breen filed a complaint against his former employer in the Circuit Court for Baltimore County (the "State Court Litigation") alleging numerous causes of action based in large part from the allegation that Mr. [read post]
27 Feb 2019, 2:14 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
On appeal from: [2017] EWHC 2360 (Admin) This appeal considered whether, where an individual has been convicted, but that conviction is not final because he has an unequivocal right to a retrial after surrender, he is ‘accused’ pursuant to the Extradition Act 2003, s 14(a), or ‘unlawfully at large’ pursuant to s 14(b) for the purposes of considering the ‘passage of time’ bar to surrender. [read post]
13 Oct 2011, 9:40 am
Self-defense is often difficult to prove, especially in situations where there are large gatherings of people and a fight breaks out. [read post]
10 Apr 2019, 2:50 am by Anthony Fairclough
It is not in doubt that Zambia has independent judges, courts and civil procedure which would ensure a just trial of large environmental group claims like this one, But the practicable impossibility of funding such group claims where the claimants are all in extreme poverty, because they could not obtain legal aid and because conditional fee agreements (CFAs) are unlawful in Zambia. [read post]
15 May 2012, 10:59 am
 Just doesn't work that way.I also largely agree -- and this seems an obvious point -- that you can't rely upon and cite Court of Appeal cases in which review has been granted. [read post]