Search for: "Label v Label"
Results 9061 - 9080
of 13,305
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
14 Jan 2011, 5:26 pm
(See Gonzales v. [read post]
14 Jan 2011, 1:47 pm
Texas Data v. [read post]
14 Jan 2011, 12:21 pm
(See Price v. [read post]
14 Jan 2011, 3:35 am
Highlights this week included: CAFC nixes 25% ‘rule of thumb’ application for estimating patent damages: Uniloc v. [read post]
13 Jan 2011, 4:30 am
This was precisely the issue before the Southern District of Florida in the case of Farias v. [read post]
12 Jan 2011, 3:59 am
Attaining tenure by estoppelLilley v Mills, App. [read post]
11 Jan 2011, 12:31 pm
(Of course, there are other arrangements, often also labeled "contract attorney," that involve much more substantive research, drafting, or advocacy, which are true independent contractor relationships rather than "temporary hire" type positions--labels can be dangerous).Fortunately, I think there is great potential for junior attorneys to structure themselves expressly as solo practitioners, yet still reap the advantages of training, mentorship and… [read post]
11 Jan 2011, 8:43 am
Baseball’s antitrust exemption, first recognized in the United States Supreme Court’s 1922 Federal Baseball Club v. [read post]
11 Jan 2011, 7:10 am
Lopez and United States v. [read post]
11 Jan 2011, 6:52 am
V. [read post]
11 Jan 2011, 4:12 am
V. [read post]
10 Jan 2011, 12:23 pm
(Lawyers: remember Raffles v. [read post]
10 Jan 2011, 11:53 am
Jacobs v. [read post]
10 Jan 2011, 9:04 am
The case is Sony Music Entertainment v. [read post]
10 Jan 2011, 5:00 am
Bank v. [read post]
10 Jan 2011, 4:31 am
In Wilson v. [read post]
10 Jan 2011, 3:20 am
Thermo-Ply, Inc (Patently-O) 7th Circuit rejects Zippo sliding scale for personal jurisdiction: Poulsen Roser A/S v. [read post]
8 Jan 2011, 2:30 pm
Bank v. [read post]
8 Jan 2011, 1:41 pm
As explained in greater detail below, although UMG places written restrictions in the labels of the CDs, it has not established that the restrictions on the CDs create a license agreement. [read post]
7 Jan 2011, 12:09 pm
Krumpelbeck v. [read post]
