Search for: "MAY v. US "
Results 9061 - 9080
of 120,389
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
30 Jan 2024, 12:00 am
Schedule I has the highest potential for abuse and lacks safety standards for medical use, while drugs in Schedule V have the lowest rate of abuse and have a clear purpose in medical treatment. [read post]
22 Apr 2014, 8:36 am
Supreme Court ruled in Missouri v. [read post]
2 Mar 2018, 2:43 pm
Parody and Fair Use thanks to the Two Live Crew, music licensing at the Olympics, U.S. v. [read post]
23 Aug 2022, 5:46 am
See Richardson v. [read post]
17 May 2023, 4:15 am
May 2, 2023). [read post]
3 Jul 2014, 9:40 pm
Ltd. v. [read post]
17 May 2023, 4:15 am
May 2, 2023). [read post]
7 Nov 2013, 6:19 pm
In Hatim v. [read post]
11 Jan 2020, 8:21 pm
The post State v. [read post]
29 Sep 2010, 1:43 pm
Jones v. [read post]
13 Jun 2022, 3:55 am
The opposition may not be amended to add an entirely new claim. [read post]
4 Jul 2018, 7:30 am
Law (Just Security Blog, July 2018) [text]Trump v Hawaii: Giving Pretext a Pass (Just Security Blog, June 2018) [text]Trump v. [read post]
8 Sep 2022, 1:00 am
"The Attorney General explained that "... courts have held that a public employee threatened with dismissal is entitled to due process protections if he has acquired a liberty or property interest in his employment; that is, a legitimate entitlement to continued employment," citing Economico v Village of Pelham, 50 NY2d 120, Elrod v Burns, 427 US 347, and Board of Regents v Roth, 408 US 564. [read post]
8 Sep 2022, 1:00 am
"The Attorney General explained that "... courts have held that a public employee threatened with dismissal is entitled to due process protections if he has acquired a liberty or property interest in his employment; that is, a legitimate entitlement to continued employment," citing Economico v Village of Pelham, 50 NY2d 120, Elrod v Burns, 427 US 347, and Board of Regents v Roth, 408 US 564. [read post]
27 Sep 2012, 4:12 am
The case is United States v. [read post]
14 Feb 2020, 2:00 am
In Moore v. [read post]
3 Apr 2007, 4:02 pm
After Mass v. [read post]
10 Oct 2007, 7:27 am
More on Medellin v. [read post]
2 Jun 2016, 12:14 am
In the 2016 case of Woolworths (Pty) Ltd & Khayalethu Christopher Mabija Case No PA 3/14 the Labour Appeal Court appears to have revisit the principles set out in the Edcon v Pillemer judgment. [read post]
15 May 2011, 9:10 pm
May 3, 2011).* Defendant was not told that if he didn’t consent, a drug dog would be used; the officer said he would then ask about using a drug dog. [read post]
