Search for: "Marks v. State " Results 9061 - 9080 of 21,691
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
31 Oct 2017, 12:05 am
The duplication was made manifest, rather than avoided, by the fact each expert repeatedly stated that he agreed with passages in the other expert's reports. [read post]
4 Jun 2018, 3:02 am
My trade mark opposition has been dismissed! [read post]
25 Aug 2013, 5:30 am by Barry Sookman
App developers “Bang-ed” up over trade mark dispute http://t.co/J2g6RKiz28 -> Another Keyword Advertising Lawsuit Fails–Allied Interstate v. [read post]
24 Dec 2008, 2:00 pm
(Techdirt) Assigning a mark without the business: a question of deception? [read post]
19 Aug 2013, 10:20 am by Bexis
Ct. at 2471 (regulatory citation and quotation marks omitted) (emphasis added). [read post]
16 Sep 2015, 9:30 pm by Karen Tani
Sabeel Rahman, Brooklyn Law, “Transcending the New Deal Idea of the State:Managerialism, Neoliberalism, and Participatory Democracy in the Regulatory State”William Novak, University of Michigan Law School, “Beyond the Idea of the NewDeal State”New Perspectives on New Deal Social Politics Elizabeth Shermer, Loyola University of Chicago, “Indentured Students and MassHigher Education”Mark Santow, University of Massachusetts, Dartmouth,… [read post]
1 Nov 2015, 5:45 am by Dennis Crouch
A few months ago I wrote about the Fourth Circuit decision in Shammas v. [read post]
29 Jul 2024, 2:51 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
This argument however misses the mark and is also unsupported by specific factual allegations. [read post]
Fed
13 Mar 2010, 5:04 pm by James Hamilton
The Fed's announcement also stated that the initial eligibility will be limited to domestic MMMFs who can meaningfully participate in the program. [read post]
5 Apr 2013, 4:41 am by Susan Brenner
On the morning of July 15, 2010, Officer Mark Moore of the Tulsa Police Department (`TPD’) responded to a call from DeGraffenreid's residence relating to child pornography. [read post]
23 Apr 2018, 2:33 pm by Ronald Mann
When the justices started their last week of arguments this morning with Lucia v. [read post]