Search for: "North v. State"
Results 9061 - 9080
of 13,331
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 Mar 2013, 2:02 pm
The North Carolina House of Representatives has passed legislation to amend the state Constitution to limit certain eminent domain powers. [read post]
28 Mar 2013, 10:36 am
The North Dakota Legislative Assembly gave final approval last week to a proposed "Personhood" amendment to the state constitution. [read post]
28 Mar 2013, 1:38 am
Jack obviously isn’t as influential north of the border. [read post]
27 Mar 2013, 2:22 pm
Lloyd v. [read post]
27 Mar 2013, 9:57 am
In WOS v. [read post]
26 Mar 2013, 9:35 am
Pennsylvania State Supreme CourtWebb v. [read post]
26 Mar 2013, 5:30 am
Perry and United States v. [read post]
23 Mar 2013, 11:45 am
The case, North Carolina Department of Health and Human Services v. [read post]
21 Mar 2013, 11:59 pm
Writing in the Guardian Patrick Butler pointed out that whereas the recent turnaround which saw families with disabled children being exempted was vaunted as a gesture towards decency and common sense, it was in fact the case that the government had been forced into an embarrassing climb down in the case of Gorry v Wiltshire and the Secretary of State where they fought tooth and nail to not have disabled children exempted. [read post]
20 Mar 2013, 11:47 am
NouvEON Technology Partners, Inc. v. [read post]
20 Mar 2013, 8:55 am
Before yesterday’s ruling in the Kirtsaeng v. [read post]
20 Mar 2013, 5:00 am
As the Supreme Court stated in Kwikset Corp. v. [read post]
19 Mar 2013, 9:39 am
Owners’ Rights Initiative Applauds Supreme Court Decision in Kirtsaeng v. [read post]
18 Mar 2013, 6:30 am
Thomas Jefferson, for one, imagined the rise of a series of allied republics in North America. [read post]
18 Mar 2013, 6:30 am
Former Pentagon General Counsel Jeh Johnson is, at this hour, giving this speech at Fordham Law School in New York: Keynote address at the Center on National Security at Fordham Law School: A “Drone Court”: Some Pros and Cons by Jeh Charles Johnson[1] March 18, 2013 [preliminary extemporaneous remarks] Thank you for this invitation. [read post]
18 Mar 2013, 2:58 am
In fact, the first Supreme Court Justice, James Wilson, wrote in Chisholm v. [read post]
16 Mar 2013, 11:01 am
In United States v. [read post]
12 Mar 2013, 10:44 am
Argument will be Wednesday, April 3, 2013, at 9:00 a.m., at the Ronald Reagan State Office Building, 300 South Spring Street, Third Floor, North Tower, Los Angeles. [read post]
11 Mar 2013, 7:32 am
Anticipating what a victory for same-sex advocates could mean in United States v. [read post]
11 Mar 2013, 5:31 am
On March 5, 2012, Burgos filed a motion asking the judge to reconsider the ruling in “light of the recent United States Supreme Court decision in” U.S. v. [read post]
