Search for: "State v. FIELDS" Results 9061 - 9080 of 12,941
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
29 Jan 2012, 12:59 pm by Angelo A. Paparelli
  If the assertion differs from existing USCIS policy, point out the difference and cite Judulang v. [read post]
27 Jan 2012, 2:21 pm by Soroush Seifi
  POTENTIAL FOR DELETERIOUS CONSEQUENCES 1)    Has Judicial Discretion already occupied the Field? [read post]
27 Jan 2012, 9:36 am by Bexis
  We have subscribers from the FDA and other governmental entities, both federal and state. [read post]
25 Jan 2012, 2:19 pm by Nicolas Croquet
Philip Lowe underlined that Member States were very much opposed to the idea of having binding targets formally imposed upon them in the field of energy efficiency: they would instead mark a strong preference for indicative targets.(7) Philip Lowe also pointed out that only 4% of small companies and 20% of large corporations established in the Union would already have a policy on energy efficiency. [read post]
25 Jan 2012, 10:34 am by Larkin Reynolds
  Rather, it is overseen by a board of three field-grade officers. [read post]
24 Jan 2012, 5:56 pm by Ruth Levor
 Earlier this week, the United States Supreme Court answered with a unanimous "yes" in United States v Jones, 565 U. [read post]
24 Jan 2012, 5:13 am by Mandelman
 For example, the complaint alleges that “the challenged provisions of SB 94 as applied by the State Bar…” … unconstitutionally infringe upon the rights of Plaintiff, other members of the State Bar and citizens of California seeking legal representation under Article I, Section l0 of the United States Constitution, which states that no State shall pass any law “impairing the Obligation of Contracts. [read post]
23 Jan 2012, 7:34 pm by Kim Krawiec
A Natural Field Experiment (NBER working paper) (5) Flynn. [read post]