Search for: "State v. Plan"
Results 9061 - 9080
of 29,602
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 Aug 2018, 3:15 am
ContextLogic https://t.co/YQHEdh4gRA 2018-08-15 Class-action copyright suit against obituary website gets certification, will move ahead https://t.co/ZIroFE1lFJ 2018-08-15 Google Plans to Launch Censored Search Engine in China, Leaked Documents Reveal https://t.co/xHiFAKQDKk 2018-08-15 Ontario Court enforces a US copyright judgment of $25 million and injunction, Dish v. [read post]
18 Aug 2018, 12:23 pm
In Natural Resources Defense Council v. [read post]
17 Aug 2018, 11:13 am
For the second time this week, a federal court has rejected the EPA's effort to delay an Obama Administration rule.Today, in Air Alliance Houston v. [read post]
17 Aug 2018, 6:43 am
For more information about how this case could impact businesses throughout the United States, get in touch with an experienced corporate planning attorney in the U.S. [read post]
17 Aug 2018, 4:11 am
” At The Federalist Society Review, Richard Raile argues that last term’s decision in partisan-gerrymandering case Gill v. [read post]
17 Aug 2018, 4:00 am
She also noted that each case involved different state regulators weighing different arguments and considerations and that the LSBC operated under a unique statutory requirement. [read post]
16 Aug 2018, 10:38 am
Dynamex Decision In late April, the California Supreme Court issued a decision in Dynamex Operations West, Inc. v. [read post]
15 Aug 2018, 2:16 pm
Case Background In Smith v. [read post]
15 Aug 2018, 6:09 am
Filippi v. [read post]
15 Aug 2018, 4:00 am
"Thus, said the court, SDHR did not err by adopting the total offset method to determine the value of Seabury's lost pension benefits and confirmed its determination. * See Executive Law §298.** Matter of Rensselaer County Sheriff's Dept. v New York State Div. of Human Rights, 131 AD3d 777.The decision is posted on the Internet at:http://www.nycourts.gov/reporter/3dseries/2018/2018_05719.htm [read post]
14 Aug 2018, 1:38 pm
The expedited briefing in the emergency appeal in that case -- State v. [read post]
14 Aug 2018, 1:25 pm
Smith v. [read post]
14 Aug 2018, 11:38 am
Similarly, in Hall v. [read post]
14 Aug 2018, 5:33 am
I am not offering here any kind of peace plan, let alone a comprehensive one. [read post]
13 Aug 2018, 5:07 pm
Also, in a parallel case (Malandrucco v. [read post]
13 Aug 2018, 1:27 pm
The court likened a 502(a)(2) claim to a qui tam claim, stating that the claims were being brought on behalf of the plans, and not the individual employees, and that the plans would benefit from any recovery. [read post]
13 Aug 2018, 12:22 pm
Whilst it goes too far to say that a CFA could never be allowed, the decision in R v (Factortame Ltd) v Secretary of State for Transport, Local Government and the Regions (No.8) [2003] QB 381 suggested that, at the very least, it should be flagged up early in the proceedings as it may go to admissibility. [read post]
13 Aug 2018, 10:00 am
In the case of Dowdy v. [read post]
13 Aug 2018, 9:34 am
” (Ashcroft v. [read post]
13 Aug 2018, 8:02 am
Swinging Richards’ attorney Herbert Schlanger—his actual last name—stated that the club planned to appeal. [read post]
