Search for: "State v. So " Results 9061 - 9080 of 116,413
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
29 Apr 2010, 12:49 pm by legalinformatics
In the visualization above, the root or sink node is the famed United States Supreme Court decision Marbury v. [read post]
9 Oct 2019, 11:52 am by Robert Black
If that is so, that would ordinarily mean that the same should be true at the state level. [read post]
10 Jul 2020, 10:03 am by Nick Armstrong
Finally, the Board says that the Secretary of State for Justice should be made a party to proceedings like the present (because the Secretary of State is the other party before the Board) and so one answer would be for the Secretary of State to be made liable for the costs. [read post]
18 Nov 2010, 12:37 pm by Bexis
July 30, 2008) (applying TwIqbal; state “pleading requirements, so far as they are concerned with the degree of detail to be alleged, are irrelevant in federal court”).The argument that state law trumps TwIqbal in a removed action was found “completely without merit” in Heffley v. [read post]
21 Nov 2013, 4:30 pm by Lauren Bateman
The brief is of course a court document above all, but it also bears on oversight—perhaps more so in this particular context. [read post]