Search for: "The State Bar Court of the State Bar of California" Results 9061 - 9080 of 11,378
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
4 Sep 2011, 7:15 am
In 2005 the parents filed suit in state court and, in 2006, HHS denied an administrative claim for damages. [read post]
4 Sep 2011, 7:15 am
In 2005 the parents filed suit in state court and, in 2006, HHS denied an administrative claim for damages. [read post]
2 Jan 2017, 4:21 pm by Kevin LaCroix
With the four additional securities suits filed in the Southern District of California, there were a total of 70 securities suits filed in California federal district courts in 2016, representing nearly 26% of all securities suits filed during the year. [read post]
30 Apr 2018, 4:08 am by Edith Roberts
Supreme Court on Monday paused for a moment to allow a California lawyer to file an amicus curiae brief that takes the form of a haiku. [read post]
26 May 2020, 3:38 am by Edith Roberts
Washington and Colorado Department of State v. [read post]
8 Jan 2018, 4:31 pm by Arthur F. Coon
CEQA Litigation/Procedural Issues Various of California’s District Courts of Appeal rendered notable decisions on a number of issues relating to the procedures and rules governing the conduct of CEQA litigation, including the following holdings: Res judicata will not apply to bar a subsequent action on the same claim between the same parties unless the first judgment was on the merits. [read post]
29 Oct 2009, 9:09 am by Fred Goldsmith
" Sponsors of the program were the Allegheny County Bar Association’s Federal Court Section, the Judges of the U.S. [read post]
23 May 2011, 9:25 am by Eugene Volokh
And, when the interests of parenthood are combined with a free exercise claim of the nature revealed by this record, more than merely a ‘reasonable relation to some purpose within the competency of the State’ is required to sustain the validity of the State’s requirement under the First Amendment. [read post]
4 Nov 2010, 11:40 am by Adam Thierer
  Will the Court hold on to the past and the old vision of “community standards” regulation that the State of California wants to extend? [read post]
1 Jul 2009, 12:38 am
The State Bar's objections follow those submitted last week by the ABA and the New York County Lawyers' Association. [read post]
27 May 2019, 6:17 am by Richard Hunt
Flourshings Plus, Inc., d/b/a the Tom Cat Bar & Grill,  2019 WL 1958284 (S.D. [read post]
27 Feb 2015, 6:15 am by John Elwood
This is the biggest bunch of Lackeys the Court has seen since, well, the bar section at the last business case. [read post]
25 Aug 2015, 7:15 am by Ann Hodges
California Teachers Association involves a First Amendment challenge to laws affecting employee speech. [read post]
19 May 2009, 1:13 am
" Supreme Court Turns Away Medical Marijuana Challenge, Steinbeck Copyright Case The Associated Press The Supreme Court won't hear another challenge to California's decade-old law permitting marijuana use for medical purposes. [read post]
23 Feb 2010, 10:41 pm by Paul Karlsgodt
The other day, a colleague tipped me off to a December 2009 blog posting by Oakland, California employment and civil rights attorney Bryan Schwartz entitled Death to the Reversionary, “Claims-Made” Settlement, a thoughtful, well-written article with which I completely disagree and to which I felt compelled to respond. [read post]
3 Jun 2014, 4:00 am by Broc Romanek
Although, to date, numerous Delaware stock corporations (and some corporations in Illinois, California, Maryland and several other jurisdiction) have adopted Chevron-type exclusive forum bylaws, there still remain certain issues regarding consent, personal jurisdiction and other mechanics. [read post]
9 Jun 2023, 4:00 am by Jim Sedor
Supreme Court ruling that dismantled a key provision of the Voting Rights Act continues to reverberate across the country a decade later, as Republican-led states pass voting restrictions that, in several cases, would have been subject to federal review had the conservative-leaning court left the provision intact. [read post]
13 May 2022, 4:36 am by Bernard Bell
The DCO’s decision not to do so was partially based on the California Bar’s dismissal of Vaz’s complaint to it due to “insufficient evidence. [read post]