Search for: "VI" Results 9061 - 9080 of 13,330
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
12 Jan 2012, 9:58 pm
The AmeriKat is unsure what the position is vis-à-vis Spain. [read post]
12 Jan 2012, 5:01 pm by Oliver G. Randl
Accordingly, and in the absence of any evidence to the contrary, the Board has no reason for rejecting the argument of the [patent proprietor] that no combination of efficient sanitisation with good cleaning is disclosed to be present or to be predictable in any of the two examples of departure. [2.4.3] Thus, the Board finds that no comparative experimental evidence is required for concluding that the subject-matter of claim 1 of the patent-in-suit solves vis-à-vis each of… [read post]
11 Jan 2012, 11:58 am by Sheppard Mullin
  In December 2011, BIS proposed new classifications relating to gas turbine engines (USML Categories VI, VII or VIII). [read post]
10 Jan 2012, 3:29 pm by Ronald London
  There were also questions about whether TV, which allows individualized blocking of programs and channels by viewers who wish to do so by using the V-Chip, could be treated differently for constitutional purposes vis-à-vis indecency, from broadcast radio, where such user-empowering tools do not yet exist. [read post]
10 Jan 2012, 10:53 am by James F. McDonough, Jr.
The Constitution implies that overrides are permitted as set forth in Article VI: “This Constitution, and the Laws of the United States which shall be made in Pursuance thereof; and all Treaties made, or which shall be made, under the Authority of the United States, shall be the supreme Law of the Land. [read post]
10 Jan 2012, 12:03 am by Giesela Ruehl
Dirk Staudenmayer 10:00 Discussion 10:30 Coffee break Chair: Morten Midtgaard Fogt VI. [read post]
9 Jan 2012, 8:47 am by Pilar G. Kraman
Patent No. 7,066,383 (“the ‘383 patent); - Count IV: Attempted Monopolization; - Count V: False Advertising under Section 43(a) of the Lanham Act; - Count VI: Deceptive Trade Practices under Delaware Law; - Count VII: Tortious Interference with Prospective Business Relations; - Count VIII: Breach of Settlement Agreement; - Count IX: Cybersquatting under the Anticybersquatting Consumer Protection Act (15 U.S.C. [read post]
8 Jan 2012, 9:34 pm by Jacob Katz Cogan
What is its place in international law more generally, especially vis-à-vis public international law? [read post]
8 Jan 2012, 4:22 pm by John H Curley
That agreement provided in relevant part:                              [C]laims of discrimination arising within the employment relationship between Company and the Crewmembers, whether such claims are made under the collective bargaining agreement or in state or federal court and alleged to be violations of state or federal law ... are to be addressed,… [read post]
8 Jan 2012, 11:00 am by Zachary Spilman
The evidence is legally and factually insufficient to support a finding that appellant committed an indecent act, indecent exposure, aggravated sexual contact with a child, attempted sodomy, and unlawful entry (specifications 1, 2 and 4 of charge III and charge VI). [read post]
8 Jan 2012, 6:30 am
“The Joint Commission [on Accreditation of Healthcare Organizations (“JCAHO”)] is urging hospitals to address the ongoing problem of health care worker fatigue as it relates to patient safety,” reported AAJ vis-à-vis potential medical malpractice. [read post]
5 Jan 2012, 11:01 am
Cita, em favor deste argumento, o disposto no artigo 648, inciso VI, do Código de Processo Penal (CPP), que preceitua: “A coação considerar-se-á ilegal, quando houver cessado o motivo que autorizou a coação”. [read post]
5 Jan 2012, 7:44 am by Rebecca Tushnet
  Clorox prepared separate containers of: (i) fresh cat feces covered with carbon; (ii) fresh cat urine covered with carbon; (iii) fresh cat feces covered with baking soda; (iv) fresh cat urine covered with baking soda; (v) uncovered feces; and (vi) uncovered urine. [read post]