Search for: "Doe Defendants I through V"
Results 9081 - 9100
of 12,273
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 Oct 2011, 1:03 pm
The Defendant argued that in these circumstances fast track rule does not apply. [read post]
18 Oct 2011, 12:16 pm
The Defendant argued that in these circumstances fast track rule does not apply. [read post]
18 Oct 2011, 8:50 am
Although it was held in Byrne v Minister for Finance that article 35.5 does not prevent the imposition of a generally applicable income tax on judges, the previous Government concluded, in 2009, that it precluded the imposition on judges not only of the public sector pay cuts, but also, the pension levy. [read post]
18 Oct 2011, 8:32 am
Although it was held in Byrne v Minister for Finance that article 35.5 does not prevent the imposition of a generally applicable income tax on judicial salaries, the previous Government concluded, in 2009, that it precluded the imposition on judges not only of the public sector pay cuts, but also, the pension levy. [read post]
17 Oct 2011, 5:57 pm
She requires the parties to walk her through the terms of the settlement. [read post]
17 Oct 2011, 12:15 pm
(Eugene Volokh) As I had expected, the Supreme Court has agreed to hear the Stolen Valor Act case (United States v. [read post]
17 Oct 2011, 5:58 am
And courts have been seeing through them for years. [read post]
16 Oct 2011, 6:42 pm
GRIMSLEY, Appellant, v. [read post]
16 Oct 2011, 5:13 pm
I’m reminded of Denedo v. [read post]
16 Oct 2011, 5:12 pm
I’m reminded of Denedo v. [read post]
15 Oct 2011, 8:02 am
§ 230(c)(2)(A).) eBay does not urge this ground in its respondent’s brief [read post]
14 Oct 2011, 9:23 am
The purposes were set out by CPAG’s counsel in rather over-blown form, if I’m honest (which was in part the undoing of this ground), as “the statutory purpose of the housing benefit scheme is to contribute to rental costs in such a way that claimants are not made homeless through inability to pay their rent. [read post]
14 Oct 2011, 9:23 am
The purposes were set out by CPAG’s counsel in rather over-blown form, if I’m honest (which was in part the undoing of this ground), as “the statutory purpose of the housing benefit scheme is to contribute to rental costs in such a way that claimants are not made homeless through inability to pay their rent. [read post]
14 Oct 2011, 7:12 am
In Penavic v Penavic, --- N.Y.S.2d ----, 2011 WL 4600442 (N.Y.A.D. 2 Dept.) the the plaintiff moved, pursuant to Judiciary Law 756 to hold the defendant in civil contempt. [read post]
14 Oct 2011, 1:17 am
McCoy v. [read post]
13 Oct 2011, 3:47 pm
BAKER HUGHES INCORPORATED, Appellee On Appeal from the 270th District Court Harris County, Texas Trial Court Case No. 2011-25539 O P I N I O N Schlumberger Technology Corporation and Baker Hughes Incorporated are in the midst of an arbitration proceeding to resolve patent disputes. [read post]
13 Oct 2011, 11:22 am
In Penavic v Penavic, --- N.Y.S.2d ----, 2011 WL 4600442 (N.Y.A.D. 2 Dept.) the the plaintiff moved, pursuant to Judiciary Law 756 to hold the defendant in civil contempt. [read post]
13 Oct 2011, 10:37 am
Louis semi truck accident lawyer, I sympathize with the Ontario plaintiffs who have fought this case through the New York state court system for so long. [read post]
13 Oct 2011, 5:00 am
Caldwell v. [read post]
13 Oct 2011, 4:26 am
See, e.g., Kotler v. [read post]
