Search for: "Gooding v. United States"
Results 9081 - 9100
of 21,084
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 Jan 2006, 4:41 pm
Groumoutis believed that "use" meant "made," he could not have believed that the marks were used in the United States because Opposer's clothing items were not made in the United States. [read post]
26 Jun 2019, 3:24 pm
United States, 18-7833 Issues: (1) Whether a post-2002 conviction for sale of cocaine or possession of cocaine with intent to sell in violation [read post]
16 Dec 2010, 4:40 am
United States v. [read post]
27 Oct 2017, 6:22 am
” United States v. [read post]
3 Mar 2007, 2:48 am
United States v. [read post]
22 Jan 2016, 8:34 am
’ United States v. [read post]
15 May 2017, 6:56 am
See Allied Interstate LLC v. [read post]
11 Jul 2020, 9:31 am
Rambling RooftopsWatson v. [read post]
8 Nov 2012, 7:35 am
It was primarily raised by the United States, acting as amicus curiae. [read post]
18 Apr 2012, 8:06 pm
Kappos v. [read post]
19 Jan 2016, 12:01 am
United States v. [read post]
8 May 2014, 9:01 pm
When the Supreme Court in Schuette v. [read post]
22 Apr 2016, 4:14 am
” Remember Justice Ginsburg writing for the Court in United States v. [read post]
25 Apr 2008, 1:10 am
UNITE HERE [read post]
19 Sep 2007, 9:06 pm
” This, the court found, compelled reversal of the TTAB’s decision.The case cite is Nike, Inc. v. [read post]
5 Feb 2010, 2:21 am
Le Hara v. [read post]
26 Feb 2015, 6:48 am
United States, reversing a fisherman’s conviction under the Sarbanes-Oxley Act for destroying undersized grouper, garnered significant coverage and commentary. [read post]
9 Nov 2011, 12:41 pm
In Greg Barnett v. [read post]
9 Nov 2011, 12:41 pm
In Greg Barnett v. [read post]
21 Sep 2016, 2:11 pm
United States, for example, his opinion for the Court decided whether the search was legal (no) and left it to the lower court to decide whether exclusion was required under existing law. [read post]
