Search for: "Liable Defendant(s)" Results 9081 - 9100 of 21,115
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
12 Jan 2017, 8:00 am by Sevens Legal
” Be Prepared and Aware With a Criminal Defense Attorney The farthest thing from your mind is that at some point your child may really need to be defended for an alleged crime in a court of law. [read post]
12 Jan 2017, 4:15 am by Howard Friedman
Finally the court dismissed claims under the Trafficking Victims Protection Reauthorization Act, holding in part:Plaintiffs suggest that Defendants are nonetheless liable because Defendants drafted the Trust documents that made Jeffs’ revelations guiding tenets in how the Trust was managed. [read post]
10 Jan 2017, 4:14 pm by Kevin LaCroix
”   Under Companies Laws revisions that went into effect in May 2016, company managers and directors can be liable to the company, to its shareholders, and to third parties for violations of their duties under the Companies Laws, breaches of company articles, and errors of management. [read post]
10 Jan 2017, 1:55 pm by Benjamin Wittes
That said, to say that the defendant is not (or should not be held) immune does not mean that the defendant is liable. [read post]
10 Jan 2017, 8:06 am by Wolfgang Demino
To establish a claim for breach of contract, a plaintiff must prove (1) the existence of a valid contract between the plaintiff and the defendant, (2) the plaintiff's performance or tender of performance, (3) the defendant's breach of the contract, and (4) the plaintiff's damages as a result of the breach. [read post]
10 Jan 2017, 8:06 am by WOLFGANG DEMINO
To establish a claim for breach of contract, a plaintiff must prove (1) the existence of a valid contract between the plaintiff and the defendant, (2) the plaintiff's performance or tender of performance, (3) the defendant's breach of the contract, and (4) the plaintiff's damages as a result of the breach. [read post]
10 Jan 2017, 6:58 am by Joy Waltemath
Because the plaintiffs recently reached a preliminary settlement with the franchisee, the McDonald’s entities are the only remaining defendants. [read post]
9 Jan 2017, 4:13 pm by Frederick B. Goldsmith
City of N.Y., 923 F.2d 22 (2d Cir. 1991), the court held that a district court’s granting of summary judgment for a defendant owner was improper where a third party had slipped on ice that had accumulated on the deck and fell on the plaintiff, causing injuries to the plaintiff. [read post]
9 Jan 2017, 10:38 am by Sharifi Firm, PLC
  The lower court had granted the defendant contractor’s summary judgment motion, based on the affirmative defense of the “completed and accepted” doctrine, dismissing the plaintiff’s negligence and fraud action. [read post]
9 Jan 2017, 6:49 am by Charles B. Jimerson, Esq.
In dismissing the participants’ fraud and misrepresentation claims, the court held that the “contracts pursuant to which they made their [customer] loan investments preclude them from establishing essential elements of those claims, namely that the Defendant banks had a duty to disclose information regarding or gained from their business dealings with [customer], and that any reliance by Plaintiffs on misrepresentations by the Defendants was reasonable. [read post]
9 Jan 2017, 2:00 am by Robert Kreisman
He also sued Tri-Cal, claiming that it was liable under respondeat superior because Keys was in the course and scope of the company’s employment. [read post]
9 Jan 2017, 2:00 am by Robert Kreisman
He also sued Tri-Cal, claiming that it was liable under respondeat superior because Keys was in the course and scope of the company’s employment. [read post]