Search for: "Municipal Court" Results 9081 - 9100 of 17,041
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
25 Nov 2018, 12:30 pm by Jennifer McGrath
City of Fontana, and ruled against the City of Fontana striking various provisions from Fontana Ordinance 1758 enacting section 30-7(B) of the Fontana Municipal Code. [read post]
25 Nov 2018, 12:30 pm by Jennifer McGrath
City of Fontana, and ruled against the City of Fontana striking various provisions from Fontana Ordinance 1758 enacting section 30-7(B) of the Fontana Municipal Code. [read post]
31 Oct 2023, 7:41 am by Unknown
The petitioners were sued by the SEC in 2018 over an alleged scheme to flip municipal bonds while acting as unregistered brokers. [read post]
19 Oct 2021, 5:00 am by Sherry F. Colb
And this term, the Court will be hearing an abortion case, Dobbs v. [read post]
19 Jul 2016, 6:48 am by Second Circuit Civil Rights Blog
The Second Circuit cites a recent State Court of Appeals ruling that "a notice of claim need not be filed for a Human Rights Law claim against against a municipality. [read post]
16 Feb 2023, 5:30 am by Public Employment Law Press
§50.5 of the Civil Service Law, Application Fees, in pertinent part, provides "(a) Every applicant for examination for a position in the competitive or non-competitive class, or in the labor class when examination for appointment is required, shall pay a fee to the civil service department or appropriate municipal commission at a time determined by it. [read post]
16 Feb 2023, 5:30 am by Public Employment Law Press
§50.5 of the Civil Service Law, Application Fees, in pertinent part, provides "(a) Every applicant for examination for a position in the competitive or non-competitive class, or in the labor class when examination for appointment is required, shall pay a fee to the civil service department or appropriate municipal commission at a time determined by it. [read post]
19 Feb 2020, 8:36 pm by MEL
Strone does emergency work for restoration and remediation for residential, commercial, industrial, and municipal clients. [read post]
4 Apr 2020, 4:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
Listed below are the captions of the most frequently accessed postings.Abolishing a position for economic reasonsAbsent a statutory or negotiated administrative hearing procedure, an appointing authority may delegate decision-making authority to the hearing officerAcquiring tenure in the position by tenure by "operation of law," sometimes referred to as tenure by estoppel or tenure by acquiesceActions of an employee prior to his or her promotion may properly form the basis for terminating… [read post]
4 Aug 2019, 10:30 am by Public Employment Law Press
Listed below are the captions of the most frequently accessed postings.Abolishing a position for economic reasonsAbsent a statutory or negotiated administrative hearing procedure, an appointing authority may delegate decision-making authority to the hearing officerAcquiring tenure in the position by tenure by "operation of law," sometimes referred to as tenure by estoppel or tenure by acquiesceActions of an employee prior to his or her promotion may properly form the basis for terminating… [read post]
18 Oct 2019, 3:45 am by Public Employment Law Press
Abolishing a position for economic reasonsAbsent a statutory or negotiated administrative hearing procedure, an appointing authority may delegate decision-making authority to the hearing officerAcquiring tenure in the position by tenure by "operation of law," sometimes referred to as tenure by estoppel or tenure by acquiesceActions of an employee prior to his or her promotion may properly form the basis for terminating the individual prior to the completion of his or her probationary… [read post]
4 Aug 2019, 10:30 am by Public Employment Law Press
Listed below are the captions of the most frequently accessed postings.Abolishing a position for economic reasonsAbsent a statutory or negotiated administrative hearing procedure, an appointing authority may delegate decision-making authority to the hearing officerAcquiring tenure in the position by tenure by "operation of law," sometimes referred to as tenure by estoppel or tenure by acquiesceActions of an employee prior to his or her promotion may properly form the basis for terminating… [read post]
18 Oct 2019, 3:45 am by Public Employment Law Press
Abolishing a position for economic reasonsAbsent a statutory or negotiated administrative hearing procedure, an appointing authority may delegate decision-making authority to the hearing officerAcquiring tenure in the position by tenure by "operation of law," sometimes referred to as tenure by estoppel or tenure by acquiesceActions of an employee prior to his or her promotion may properly form the basis for terminating the individual prior to the completion of his or her probationary… [read post]
4 Apr 2020, 4:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
Listed below are the captions of the most frequently accessed postings.Abolishing a position for economic reasonsAbsent a statutory or negotiated administrative hearing procedure, an appointing authority may delegate decision-making authority to the hearing officerAcquiring tenure in the position by tenure by "operation of law," sometimes referred to as tenure by estoppel or tenure by acquiesceActions of an employee prior to his or her promotion may properly form the basis for terminating… [read post]
21 May 2012, 8:08 am by admin
— which filed the biggest Chapter 9 municipal bankruptcy in American history this fall after its sewer-construction financing fell apart and a court threw out one of its taxes — county commissioners were voting to default on a General Obligation bond payment. [read post]
28 Jan 2019, 8:18 am by James S. Friedman, LLC
Friedman, Esq., is centrally based in New Brunswick, New Jersey, and represents criminal defendants in the New Jersey Superior Court in all counties, all New Jersey municipal courts, the New York State trial courts in Manhattan and Brooklyn, and the federal district courts in New Jersey and New York City. [read post]
As a result, the appellate court threw out the trial court’s order and sent the case back for further consideration of the threshold issues. [read post]