Search for: "R. B." Results 9081 - 9100 of 55,718
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 Aug 2018, 11:19 am
SEC Obtains Final Judgment Against Research Scientist Charged with Insider Trading (SEC Litigation Release No. 24225)https://www.sec.gov/litigation/litreleases/2018/lr24225.htmResearch scientist  Fei Yan agreed to settle with the SEC and consented in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York  to the entry of a judgment permanently enjoining him from violating Sections 10(b) and 14(e) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and Rules 10b-5 and 14e-3… [read post]
2 Aug 2018, 11:40 pm by Tessa Shepperson
The article describes other home building initiatives b Tesco, Morrisons, Sainsburys and Aldi. [read post]
2 Aug 2018, 7:18 pm by Dan Harris
Lack of transparency (subcontracting outside of an approved facility, changing a component without notice, etc.). b. [read post]
The Second Circuit agreed with the trial court’s conclusion that a plaintiff’s ability to bring a class action on behalf of out-of-state class members is not an issue of Article III standing, but rather a question of predominance under Rule 23(b)(3). [read post]
1 Aug 2018, 9:05 pm by Dan Flynn
In-house washed & cut lettuce observed at 53 degrees fahrenheit in walk in after 4 hours of cooling observed within deep covered pans at a depth of roughly 6 inches *discussed to use less product in pans and ensure after washing lettuce and spinning that 41 degrees fahrenheit is observed prior to walk in*To prevent the growth of pathogens: (1) Cooling shall be accomplished in accordance with the time and temperature criteria by using one or more of the following methods based on the type of food… [read post]
1 Aug 2018, 11:52 am by Victoria Clark
ICYMI: Yesterday on Lawfare Kemal Kirisci and Ilke Toygür questioned how NATO should address the decline of democracy in Turkey. [read post]
1 Aug 2018, 7:37 am by Dave Wieneke
Causing a response: a. increased search for local service points; or b. more requests for sales contact. [read post]
1 Aug 2018, 6:40 am by Jessica Kroeze
The Applicant requested confirmation of the priority right being in force.The EPO then issued a notification of loss of rights under Rule 112(1) EPC stating that the "decision by the receiving Office to restore the right of priority based on the criterion of unintentionality has no effect in proceedings before the EPO (R. 49ter.1(b) PCT) and no valid request under Rule 49ter.2 PCT has been filed". [read post]