Search for: "Short v. United States" Results 9081 - 9100 of 10,137
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
17 Apr 2022, 12:12 am by Frank Cranmer
Clare Ryan, Strasbourg Observers: Lee v the United Kingdom: A trend toward heightened pleading standards? [read post]
4 Mar 2013, 3:48 pm by Steve Vladeck
That’s why, in cases like Munaf v. [read post]
7 Jul 2022, 8:52 am by Chris Castle
  It’s whether the government is paying just compensation for taking away rights under the Constitution of the United States. [read post]
18 Oct 2006, 10:49 am
United Grain Growers Ltd., [1997] 3 S.C.R. 701 for essentially the same conduct that attracted the punitive damage award. [read post]
27 Aug 2024, 9:05 pm by Timothy D. Lytton
The problem has become so bad that contaminated fruits and vegetables are now the leading cause of foodborne illness in the United States. [read post]
14 Feb 2010, 2:36 pm by Martin George
Accordingly, the proposals provide for an exclusive head of jurisdiction for court proceedings supporting arbitration in the civil courts of the Member States and the corresponding obligation of the courts in all other Member States to transfer parallel litigation to the courts of the Member State where the arbitration takes place. [read post]
27 Feb 2014, 10:10 am by Devlin Hartline
How the volitional conduct test operates in the cloud is demonstrated in the Hotfile case, where the district court stated: Thus, the law is clear that Hotfile and [the owner] are not liable for direct copyright infringement because they own and manage internet facilities that allow others to upload and download copyrighted material. . . . [read post]
26 May 2022, 4:16 am by Emma Snell
The original proposal, backed by the U.S. and more than 40 other countries, condemns Russia’s actions but stops short of immediately suspending its voting rights at the U.N. health agency. [read post]
7 Sep 2020, 10:04 am by Paul Rosenzweig, Vishnu Kannan
More pointedly, it provides (in §606(c)) that: Upon proclamation by the President that there exists war or a threat of war, or a state of public peril or disaster or other national emergency, or in order to preserve the neutrality of the United States, the President, if he deems it necessary in the interest of national security or defense, may suspend or amend, for such time as he may see fit, the rules and regulations applicable to any or all stations or devices… [read post]
29 May 2023, 2:40 pm by Bill Marler
Symptoms typically last a relatively short amount of time, approximately 24 to 48 hours. [read post]
7 Apr 2023, 12:52 pm by Igor Nikolic
The Huawei v ZTE case provided a framework for good-faith negotiation, and courts of the EU member states have become accustomed to evaluating the conduct of both parties. [read post]
3 Aug 2017, 12:13 pm
Yesterday, almost two years after hearing arguments, the Supreme Court of South Carolina finally issued its decision in the case of The Protestant Episcopal Diocese of South Carolina, et al. v. [read post]