Search for: "State of California v. United States"
Results 9081 - 9100
of 13,836
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 Jun 2012, 9:07 pm
Chen of the United States District Court for the Northern District of California examined the principal-agent relationship between the parties to determine what responsibilities each had to the other based on the relationship’s underlying agreements and under California law. [read post]
26 Jun 2012, 5:37 pm
Supreme Court ruled in Knox v. [read post]
26 Jun 2012, 1:21 pm
The United States Supreme Court granted certiorari on Monday to resolve this issue in the case of Vance v. [read post]
25 Jun 2012, 1:40 pm
The United States Supreme Court today continued with its line of cases favoring children in the decisions of Miller v. [read post]
25 Jun 2012, 11:51 am
United States, which involved the question of whether fleeing from the police in a car was a violent felony, and Graham v. [read post]
25 Jun 2012, 10:39 am
Shaft, Implementing the settlement of State of North Dakota v. [read post]
25 Jun 2012, 10:11 am
United States v. [read post]
25 Jun 2012, 9:47 am
United States (No. 11-9307) (case page forthcoming), in which it will consider how to treat an error that becomes plain during the appeal. [read post]
25 Jun 2012, 9:47 am
United States (No. 11-9307) (case page forthcoming), in which it will consider how to treat an error that becomes plain during the appeal. [read post]
25 Jun 2012, 8:43 am
Porro v. [read post]
23 Jun 2012, 8:02 am
The lower court had held that while there was lack of probable cause for that search warrant, they could invoke the good faith doctrine established by United States v. [read post]
22 Jun 2012, 9:35 am
In a 7-2 decision yesterday, the United States Supreme Court sharply criticized a public-sector union for a special dues assessment. [read post]
22 Jun 2012, 8:41 am
As California wage and hour lawyers we read with interest the United States Supreme Court's opinion in Christopher v. [read post]
22 Jun 2012, 8:30 am
On March 21, the California Supreme Court granted review in Sanchez v. [read post]
22 Jun 2012, 6:27 am
Paragraphs 7-10 of the Complaint say Madsen, Dougherty, Hillman and Grives (i) are “United States citizen[s] and resident[s] of the State of California” and (ii) were, at “all times relevant” to the claims in the Complaint, “supervisory employee[s] of . . . [read post]
21 Jun 2012, 2:00 pm
” Brief for United States as Amicus Curiae 12? [read post]
21 Jun 2012, 1:13 pm
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of California. [read post]
21 Jun 2012, 4:30 am
Of course you have, if you’re in the United States (or New Zealand — the rest of the modern world bans the practice). [read post]
20 Jun 2012, 1:16 pm
Appealed from the United States District Court for the Southern District of California. [read post]
20 Jun 2012, 12:20 pm
After the United States Supreme Court issued its decision in AT&T Mobility LLC v. [read post]
