Search for: "State v. Little"
Results 9081 - 9100
of 23,580
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 Jul 2014, 9:30 am
To help them cross that line, let’s enjoy some river music, as Tina Turner belts out a little Proud Mary. [read post]
29 Jun 2010, 9:29 am
Ever since the Court issued its decision in D.C. v. [read post]
1 Mar 2010, 8:28 am
As the court explained in Arellano v. [read post]
22 Sep 2010, 1:15 pm
State v. [read post]
5 May 2020, 3:54 am
At Slate, David Gans argues that “[t]he sweeping arguments for a total religious exemption” in Little Sisters of the Poor Saints Peter and Paul Home v. [read post]
13 Feb 2010, 5:58 pm
Kane v. [read post]
31 Dec 2022, 2:51 pm
The privilege does not appear to be recognized in Virginia, but this is of little practical effect because the privilege only protects opinions (see Phillips v. [read post]
5 Oct 2009, 1:32 am
John B. v. [read post]
5 Oct 2009, 1:32 am
John B. v. [read post]
5 Oct 2009, 2:32 am
John B. v. [read post]
1 Jan 2019, 9:01 pm
This amendment set out New YorkState's response to the United States Supreme Court's decision in Janus v American Federation of State, County, and Municipal Employees, Council 31, et al, 138 SCt 2448.In Janus the high court held that states and public-sector unions may no longer require "nonconsenting employees" in a collective bargaining unit to pay an "agency shop fee" in lieu of becoming a member the certified or recognized… [read post]
1 Jan 2019, 9:01 pm
This amendment set out New YorkState's response to the United States Supreme Court's decision in Janus v American Federation of State, County, and Municipal Employees, Council 31, et al, 138 SCt 2448.In Janus the high court held that states and public-sector unions may no longer require "nonconsenting employees" in a collective bargaining unit to pay an "agency shop fee" in lieu of becoming a member the certified or recognized… [read post]
6 Oct 2022, 4:00 am
Second, he contended that if the state itself would be constitutionally forbidden from making race the "predominant factor" in drawing its maps (as the Court's cases say), then it makes little sense to allow VRA plaintiffs to satisfy their prima facie burden by doing so. [read post]
15 Jan 2009, 2:11 am
Yesterday, at the State of the Net conference in Washington DC, a report by the ‘Internet Safety Technical Task Force‘ was launched. [read post]
3 Mar 2009, 5:00 am
Hutchins v. [read post]
28 Jun 2010, 9:38 am
United States, 295 U. [read post]
30 Jul 2009, 9:38 pm
Western States Medical Center v. [read post]
2 Jun 2016, 9:01 pm
A little over a decade ago, Justice Scalia delivered the judgment of the Court—writing for himself and three other justices in Vieth v. [read post]
9 Jul 2024, 11:28 am
Regulation platforms build solidarity among States. [read post]
1 May 2014, 8:31 am
California and United States v. [read post]
