Search for: "State v. Losee" Results 9081 - 9100 of 14,203
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
11 Jun 2012, 6:00 am
Both state and federal courts in New York favor deciding cases on the merits. [read post]
10 Jun 2012, 9:30 pm by Linda D. Jellum
 This essay is based on her recent article, Heads I Win, Tails You Lose: Reconciling Brown v. [read post]
10 Jun 2012, 8:38 pm by Charon QC
Download our retainer letter (Word) Society warns over patents court decision The Law Society has warned the government that the UK could lose up to £3bn a year if a new patents court is not based in London. [read post]
10 Jun 2012, 6:11 am by Max Kennerly, Esq.
Rosemarie Arnold, in bleating a $30M claim to the press, just made my job more difficult, as well as the jobs of all the other personal injury attorneys in the state. [read post]
9 Jun 2012, 5:13 am by Russell Beck
” California: On May 14, 2012, the United States District Court for the Eastern District of California issued a lengthy decision (Vance’s Foods, Inc. v. [read post]
7 Jun 2012, 10:20 am by Michael M. O'Hear
One way or another, police would lose the benefits of a degrading search process. [read post]
7 Jun 2012, 9:58 am by Arthur F. Coon
 In addition to the option of requesting that the lead agency prepare the record, and despite the fact that the lead agency and real party have the most to lose from an inadequate or underinclusive record (e.g., Protect Our Water v. [read post]
7 Jun 2012, 3:00 am by Ken
Take it away, Martinez v. [read post]
6 Jun 2012, 11:15 pm by 1 Crown Office Row
In last week’s judgment in Assange v The Swedish Prosecution Authority [2012] UKSC 22, the Supreme Court decided that the words ‘judicial authority’ in s 2(2) of the Extradition Act 2003 include prosecutors as well as courts. [read post]
5 Jun 2012, 6:51 pm
In the context of merger analysis, a noted authority on antitrust law, sums up stating that: “[f]or antitrust purposes,…. [read post]
5 Jun 2012, 5:43 pm
In the United States, several states began to fear losing investments to offshore jurisdictions. [read post]