Search for: "State v. So " Results 9081 - 9100 of 116,413
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
23 Jan 2019, 12:58 pm
Taggart wasn't supposed to leave Kern County (or the state).Which, of course, he subsequently did. [read post]
26 Sep 2008, 1:13 am
So I quickly went to the Federal Circuit website and, of course, could not find a Microsoft case because the case is really Lucent v. [read post]
4 Nov 2009, 5:30 am
   Race-based restrictions on marriage have been illegal for, oh, 42 years now, since the Supreme Court's decision in Loving v. [read post]
24 Oct 2024, 3:00 am by Meredith Ervine
Here are some high-level thoughts about the comments and correspondence we’ve seen so far: – Consistent with recent staff comments, the comment letters clarify that stating that no relationship exists (even if a particular measure is not used in setting compensation) isn’t compliant with Item 402(v)(5)(ii) — especially where a relationship may exist. [read post]
25 Apr 2012, 10:24 am by Sumter Camp
There being nothing of particular interest issued in the last couple of days [okay, so I'm about a week late with this] we are going to reach back to a case from January, United States v. [read post]
7 Feb 2019, 9:17 am
  Goodness knows, speech is now so tightly constrained by data driven expectations satisfaction that is is hard to imagine why they would even try to write something original for consumption. [read post]