Search for: "United States v. Burden"
Results 9081 - 9100
of 9,844
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 Sep 2008, 7:45 am
Corp. v United States Liab. [read post]
16 Sep 2008, 12:12 am
United States, 389 U.S. 347, 357 (1967); Commonwealth v. [read post]
14 Sep 2008, 3:26 pm
A pretty good panel gives us a pretty disappointing decision, in United States v. [read post]
12 Sep 2008, 2:33 pm
: (IP finance), MARQUES international advertising portal goes live: (Class 46) Global - Patents Using patent landscaping analytics to improve the quality of M & A decisions: a review of Cox Enterprises’ $300M purchase of Adify: (IP Asset Maximiser Blog), Universities reap royalty rewards; investors ignore IP at their peril: (IAM), Top IP-owning nations claim faster patent processing; near harmonisation deal: (Intellectual Property Watch), Bosch, Xerox and Dupont sign up… [read post]
9 Sep 2008, 2:25 pm
Horn, No. 03-9010, 03-9011 In a capital-murder case, petition for a writ of habeas corpus is granted where: 1) the time period for filing the petition was tolled during state-court proceedings, and the federal petition was therefore timely; 2) the state fugitive-forfeiture rule did not apply to procedurally default the petition; 3) the jury instructions and verdict sheet that were used during the penalty phase of petitioner's trial denied him due process of law pursuant to… [read post]
8 Sep 2008, 12:30 pm
Bryant v. [read post]
8 Sep 2008, 8:41 am
It would seem, therefore, that the extra burden of proof imposed upon students in regard to proof of their domicil may only be held constitutional if a compelling state interest is thereby served.U.S. v. [read post]
5 Sep 2008, 12:07 pm
Parrish barred Hartmann from acting as the legal advisor in the case of United States v. [read post]
5 Sep 2008, 8:28 am
(Apotex) appeals the order of the United States District Court for the District of New Jersey dismissing its declaratory judgment action for noninfringement against Plaintiffs-Appellees Janssen Pharmaceutica, N.V. and Janssen, L.P. [read post]
4 Sep 2008, 8:43 pm
Supreme Court recently explained the nature of facial challenges:Under United States v. [read post]
4 Sep 2008, 8:43 pm
Supreme Court recently explained the nature of facial challenges:Under United States v. [read post]
3 Sep 2008, 4:03 pm
United States v. [read post]
3 Sep 2008, 12:30 pm
Fiddler v. [read post]
2 Sep 2008, 5:17 pm
Salazar, No. 07-40683 Conviction and sentence for witness tampering are affirmed where: 1) conviction was based on sufficient evidence; 2) an objection to the application of a cross-reference to a sentencing guideline was waived; 3) the penalty provisions of the witness-tampering statute were correctly applied; and 4) the proper burden of proof was applied in determining sentence enhancements. . [read post]
1 Sep 2008, 10:01 pm
I use the recent United States Supreme Court case Kelo v. [read post]
1 Sep 2008, 7:52 pm
After all, the Third Circuit's decision in United States v. [read post]
1 Sep 2008, 7:52 pm
After all, the Third Circuit's decision in United States v. [read post]
1 Sep 2008, 3:28 am
United States v. [read post]
31 Aug 2008, 11:14 am
United States Forest Service, a case in which Native Americans unsuccessfully sought to stop the federal government from allowing the... [read post]
29 Aug 2008, 2:00 pm
In the case, United States v. [read post]
