Search for: "Gooding v. United States"
Results 9101 - 9120
of 21,084
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
30 Oct 2015, 3:00 am
I blogged here about United States v. [read post]
29 Oct 2015, 5:30 pm
In dismissing the application in DHR International, Inc a company incorporated in Delaware in the United States of America v Challis [2015] NSWSC 1567, White J found that the plaintiff failed to show that the statements in the blog were false, ‘or at least materially false’ – a key element of the tort of injurious falsehood. [read post]
29 Oct 2015, 5:22 am
The Court could still grant the pending petition from the Eleventh Circuit in United States v. [read post]
28 Oct 2015, 11:48 am
Nevin relented for good. [read post]
28 Oct 2015, 10:12 am
V Secret, (2) clarifying the standard of proof needed to establish federal dilution of a famous trademark, (3)confirming that dilution can be established through blurring, and (4) defining “fame” as being “widely recognized by the general consuming public of the United States,” which would eliminate niche market fame. [read post]
28 Oct 2015, 4:30 am
Pennsylvania law is not quite as good. [read post]
27 Oct 2015, 5:44 am
” Prison policy bars officers from engaging in “[b]ehavior, [including] off duty conduct, which renders continued employment contrary to the best interest of [the prison]” and “[a]ccepting money, goods or favors from detainees. [read post]
27 Oct 2015, 5:40 am
The opinion is styled, Carlos Alaniz v. [read post]
26 Oct 2015, 12:40 pm
The Proposed Rule gives F-1 students additional opportunities to extend their employment in the United States, but simultaneously burdens employers with substantial additional responsibilities to plan for, monitor, and evaluate their STEM OPT F-1 student employee population. [read post]
26 Oct 2015, 5:30 am
As per the conceptual comparison, the Court endorsed the Board of Appeal’s findings that the word ‘elma’ is an unusual female first name and is also the name of four small towns in the United States [which, for what it’s worth, a Greek consumer would have never thought], and that the word ‘elmex’ is devoid of any meaning. [read post]
26 Oct 2015, 3:51 am
The Board found opposer's mark MAPPIN & WEBB to be inherently distinctive, but having "little, if any, marketplace strength in the United States. [read post]
26 Oct 2015, 1:01 am
” (People v. [read post]
25 Oct 2015, 12:26 pm
Dimaya v. [read post]
25 Oct 2015, 5:21 am
The style of the case is, Calvary United Pentecostal Church v. [read post]
23 Oct 2015, 1:07 pm
From the First Amendment side, we have Reed v. [read post]
23 Oct 2015, 10:15 am
” Bivens v. [read post]
23 Oct 2015, 10:05 am
United States, 14-10154, probably returns for a second time. [read post]
23 Oct 2015, 8:58 am
In the case, Skatteverket (Swedish Tax Agency) v. [read post]
23 Oct 2015, 8:27 am
Unlike FON patrols, the Philippines v. [read post]
23 Oct 2015, 4:00 am
As a result, record systems are no longer single, stationary units as are paper records systems. [read post]
