Search for: "House v. House"
Results 9101 - 9120
of 41,254
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 May 2010, 8:42 am
United States v. [read post]
1 Dec 2021, 4:11 pm
[My testimony today before a House Subcommittee on Communications & Technology hearing on proposed revisions to § 230.] [read post]
10 May 2007, 5:56 am
It might be an interesting show: Digital Future of the United States: Part V: The Future of Video [via 463] Subcommittee on Telecommunications and the Internet Hearing 9:30 a.m. in room 2123 Rayburn House Office Building Witness List Connect to the Live Video Webcast 100 kbps Later: 463 has busily been preparing and posting links to chunks of the hearing - see the May 10 and May 11 postings (consolidated as part of the Online Video Policy section). [read post]
28 Sep 2010, 11:18 am
Occupying ad space in numerous places on one of London’s major streets, the poster promotes blowing the whistle on housing fraud. [read post]
14 Apr 2023, 11:36 am
The Act was introduced in response to the United States Supreme Court’s Dobbs decision overturning Roe v. [read post]
4 May 2015, 5:59 am
“Think Brown v. [read post]
28 Sep 2010, 11:18 am
Occupying ad space in numerous places on one of London’s major streets, the poster promotes blowing the whistle on housing fraud. [read post]
6 May 2017, 12:00 am
House Bill 492, received unanimous support in both the House and Senate. [read post]
18 Aug 2011, 1:31 pm
The 2,328 pages of records, obtained by Judicial Watch pursuant to a March 23, 2011, Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) lawsuit (Judicial Watch v. [read post]
1 May 2008, 7:31 am
(See Goldfarb v. [read post]
24 Aug 2023, 6:00 am
For some policymakers, the repeal of Roe v. [read post]
26 Sep 2021, 12:18 pm
(Nick does not practice in housing law, but created this for reasons, and I am very glad that he did! [read post]
21 Jul 2010, 9:51 pm
There was insufficient evidence that former Senator Pete V. [read post]
6 Jan 2020, 8:03 am
(Not to mention the showdown over Google’s fair use loophole brewing in the Supreme Court in the Google v. [read post]
3 Nov 2023, 2:43 am
They claimed this constituted a licensable HMO, and as there was no license, this amounted to an offence under the Housing and Planning Act 2016. [read post]
2 Dec 2008, 7:42 pm
Department of Housing and Urban Development ......... [read post]
2 Aug 2012, 7:22 am
In Picaro v. [read post]
26 Sep 2012, 2:05 pm
In Hatfield v. [read post]
14 Jun 2011, 4:38 pm
Also differences based on housing status has been held to be within Art 14 (Larkos v Cyprus 30 EHRR 597, R (RJM) v Secretary of State for Work and Pensions [2009] 1 AC 311).If the arguments were right, it would affect many provisions of the Housing Acts and Rent Acts. [read post]
25 Jun 2012, 7:45 am
On June 22, the Court also decided People v Henix, No 144531. [read post]
