Search for: "I v. B"
Results 9101 - 9120
of 24,601
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Feb 2025, 11:00 am
On b) and following Chishimba v Kensington & Chelsea RLBC (2013) EWCA Civ 786 and R v Exeter City Council ex p Gliddon and Draper (1984) 14 HLR 103, the principle established was: Where an applicant obtains a tenancy of a property by deception, and was not eligible to that accommodation from the start, it cannot be said that the applicant has accommodation that it was reasonable for them to continue to occupy. [read post]
26 Aug 2014, 9:22 am
Johnson & Son, Inc. v. [read post]
20 Aug 2011, 2:45 pm
Ltd. v. [read post]
27 May 2014, 1:37 pm
"I write separately to express my concern that, under our case law, harmless-error review based on post-conviction factual submissions could swallow up the rule of Apprendi v. [read post]
28 Feb 2018, 8:09 am
V. [read post]
22 Oct 2008, 10:30 am
" U.S. v. [read post]
20 May 2025, 3:26 pm
§ 363(b) — Federal bankruptcy law requiring notice and hearing for selling property outside the ordinary course of business MDNC Local Rule 4001-1(f) — Middle District of NC rule specifically requiring a motion to sell property unless your plan explicitly provides otherwise Trantham v. [read post]
28 Aug 2013, 4:38 am
State v. [read post]
29 May 2014, 8:03 pm
Category: Claim Construction By: Roy Rabindranath, Contributor TitleRealtime Data, LLC v. [read post]
22 Jul 2006, 11:22 am
" The statute also provides that "a civil action for a violation of this section may be brought only if the conduct involves 1 of the factors set forth in clause (i), (ii), (iii), (iv), or (v) of subsection (a)(5)(B). [read post]
6 Sep 2011, 3:16 pm
Kidron v. [read post]
29 Apr 2016, 12:54 am
B. [read post]
8 Oct 2010, 1:04 pm
I nominated several of the selected folks. [read post]
13 Jun 2008, 12:47 am
Monday's Supreme Court decision in Enquist v. [read post]
5 Jul 2020, 7:58 pm
In Nanda v. [read post]
31 Dec 2013, 9:57 am
United States v. [read post]
11 Aug 2008, 3:14 pm
I. [read post]
2 Jun 2009, 8:12 am
See, e.g., Shapiro v. [read post]
2 Jun 2010, 10:20 am
No Pet Policy Does Not Violate State or Federal Fair Housing Acts Hawn v. [read post]
20 May 2010, 4:12 pm
(Eugene Volokh) I blogged in March about the court’s rejecting the religious accommodation claim in this case, but the court (in Jama v. [read post]
