Search for: "Individual Does 1-10"
Results 9101 - 9120
of 14,827
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 Mar 2014, 7:01 pm
Section 1396p (b) (1) permits a state to recover for medical assistance properly paid only in limited circumstances: (A) In the case of an individual described in subsection (a)(1)(B) of this section, the State shall seek adjustment or recovery from the individual's estate or upon sale of the property subject to a lien imposed on account of medical assistance paid on behalf of the individual. [read post]
18 Mar 2014, 10:56 am
That provided as follows: Coterminous owners are mutually bound equally to maintain: 1. [read post]
17 Mar 2014, 5:28 pm
It does not compel a finding in accordance with that inference. [read post]
16 Mar 2014, 4:34 pm
Section 15-48-130(a)(2), the Court decided to look to federal applications of “evident partiality” (as the language in FAA –Section 9 U.S.C. 10(a)(2)- is similar). [read post]
16 Mar 2014, 4:34 pm
Section 15-48-130(a)(2), the Court decided to look to federal applications of “evident partiality” (as the language in FAA –Section 9 U.S.C. 10(a)(2)- is similar). [read post]
14 Mar 2014, 10:08 am
Here are a few of the most common: 1. [read post]
13 Mar 2014, 11:48 am
What about the individual artist? [read post]
12 Mar 2014, 10:01 pm
“Does that make a difference? [read post]
12 Mar 2014, 8:57 am
Coalition for Peace and Ethics Working Paper No. 1/1 (2014)). [read post]
11 Mar 2014, 12:00 am
In the end, a great deal will depend of an individual’s financial well being and sources of income. [read post]
10 Mar 2014, 5:02 am
That does not mean it is any less valid of a question. [read post]
10 Mar 2014, 4:00 am
§11040, ¶¶1(D), 2(M). [read post]
9 Mar 2014, 7:05 pm
Moreover, this does not involve a typical case of self-dealing where the fiduciary acts in his interest to the detriment of the beneficiaries. [read post]
9 Mar 2014, 2:16 pm
I disucuss these at length here:1. [read post]
7 Mar 2014, 11:58 am
NASA 1. [read post]
7 Mar 2014, 10:02 am
Id. at **9-10. [read post]
7 Mar 2014, 1:29 am
Baranow, 2011 SCC 10, [2011] 1 S.C.R.269.Ontario continues to follow this equities-based approach. [read post]
6 Mar 2014, 9:06 pm
The article was created for general guidance on matters of interest only, and does not constitute legal advice. [read post]
6 Mar 2014, 5:52 pm
Innovation at *10.[2] Defendants further contend that, even if the Court finds a restraint of trade, Cascades has pled no unreasonable restraint of trade [under Section 1]. [read post]
6 Mar 2014, 11:49 am
(The $3000 amount being 10% of the $30,000 bond.) [read post]
