Search for: "MATTER OF B T B" Results 9101 - 9120 of 19,429
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
15 Oct 2015, 1:21 pm by familoo
Zoe is a barrister at St John’s Chambers, who specialises in financial matters after a relationship ends. [read post]
15 Oct 2015, 1:08 pm
Virginia courts have not recognized a pharmacist-patient privilege in the evidentiary sense, but that doesn't mean they wouldn't apply a qualified privilege to such communications in the context of assessing defamation liability. [read post]
15 Oct 2015, 8:08 am by Lee E. Berlik
Virginia courts have not recognized a pharmacist-patient privilege in the evidentiary sense, but that doesn’t mean they wouldn’t apply a qualified privilege to such communications in the context of assessing defamation liability. [read post]
15 Oct 2015, 6:01 am by Administrator
The Australasian Institute of Judicial Administration’s Guide to Judicial Conduct recognises the presence of humour, commenting that ‘[t]he trial of an action, whether civil or criminal, is a serious matter but that does not mean that occasional humour is out of place in a courtroom, provided that it does not embarrass a party or witness’. [read post]
14 Oct 2015, 6:09 am by Sean Hanover
Rule 54(b) won't work, and you are left with.... 28 U.S.C. [read post]
14 Oct 2015, 4:00 am by Dianne Saxe
The NEB says it does not “regulate matters related to, and [could not] make broad policy decisions on, subjects such as climate change or oil sands development. [read post]
13 Oct 2015, 12:11 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
” Didn’t specify much of anything for senders or recipients of notices b/c the DMCA already gives plenty of detail about what you’re supposed to do. [read post]
13 Oct 2015, 9:48 am by Abbott & Kindermann
An exemption is appropriate as long as the effect on the receiving school sites is the lesser of (a) increase in student population over 25% over existing capacity or (b) ten classrooms. [read post]
13 Oct 2015, 1:37 am by William Sinclair
The new Report would change Rule 8-423(b), which provides for the bond in an appeal from an unsecured money judgment, to clarify that it is still subject to Md. [read post]
13 Oct 2015, 1:37 am by William Sinclair
The new Report would change Rule 8-423(b), which provides for the bond in an appeal from an unsecured money judgment, to clarify that it is still subject to Md. [read post]
12 Oct 2015, 6:53 am by Peter Margulies
 However Tim’s suggestion that Congress drop the “conduct of the foreign affairs of the United States” prong of the FISA Amendments Act (FAA) doesn’t reckon with that proposed reform’s costs. [read post]