Search for: "Matter of Mark T."
Results 9101 - 9120
of 16,588
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 Nov 2013, 1:37 pm
The court rejects Axceler’s argument that it isn’t really using the Avepoint mark for trademark purposes. [read post]
18 Nov 2013, 12:23 pm
If his point were merely that the Snowden revelations have eroded the US’s international position on matters of internet governance in favor of countries that don’t value freedom, he would certainly be right. [read post]
18 Nov 2013, 7:05 am
These statements were made via Twitter (e.g., referring to AvePoint as the “Red Dragon” and “MADEINCHINA”) and in conversations.Axceler argued that the first three statements weren’t defamatory as a matter of law. [read post]
18 Nov 2013, 4:00 am
A comment in Mark Lewis' recent post caught my eye. [read post]
16 Nov 2013, 9:12 am
While Anna Vasquez made parole last November and has advocated for the release of the other three since, they have all experienced delays in parole because they refuse to “admit” to crimes they didn’t commit. [read post]
15 Nov 2013, 3:03 pm
That’s the case for all such seizure matters, referred to as civil-asset forfeiture. [read post]
15 Nov 2013, 2:21 pm
“[T]he ultimate question is whether the Charbucks Marks are likel [read post]
15 Nov 2013, 11:34 am
It wasn’t the right time to "cut plaintiffs off at the knees":[T]his order does not settle any law that will be applied at trial. [read post]
15 Nov 2013, 8:00 am
The group stated that “Champagne doesn’t have one single colour, so we can’t say that a ‘Champagne’ colour exists. [read post]
14 Nov 2013, 10:51 am
Defendants moved to dismiss for lack of subject matter jurisdiction, and the court granted the motion. [read post]
14 Nov 2013, 10:51 am
No, this is not the applicable law in the U.S., but it matters for a few reasons. [read post]
14 Nov 2013, 9:00 am
In a more sensible world we should be able to dispose of these matters in a couple of hours and then get on with the important things in life. [read post]
14 Nov 2013, 8:29 am
Tuesday also marked the end of the line for Unger v. [read post]
14 Nov 2013, 3:24 am
But it’s equally apparent that the last few decades – and especially the last five years – have been marked by significant steps forward: to keep a nation’s promise. [read post]
13 Nov 2013, 12:25 pm
That matters, because Canonical’s actions reflect a much bigger problem: a pervasive and unfounded belief that if you don’t police every unauthorized use of a trademark you are in danger of losing it. [read post]
13 Nov 2013, 12:16 pm
Entm’t 2000, Inc. v. [read post]
13 Nov 2013, 5:42 am
Once the Bais Din decree is eliminated as a source of authority for the judge’s August 27, 2010 enforcement order — as it must be — the order cannot be sustained because it constitutes impermissible judicial involvement in a matter of religious practice. [read post]
12 Nov 2013, 6:31 am
” AT&T Techs., Inc. v. [read post]
12 Nov 2013, 6:29 am
Judge Koh disagreed with Apple on one of them, but agreed on the other, the Galaxy S II (AT&T). [read post]
12 Nov 2013, 4:42 am
However, matters are different in respect of the philosopher’s rights. [read post]
