Search for: "Petite v. United States"
Results 9101 - 9120
of 13,105
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 Jul 2008, 7:07 am
United States, 517 U.S. 748, 755 (1996). [read post]
11 Jan 2007, 6:47 am
As I recently blogged about here, we just filed a cert petition on whether Maryland v. [read post]
18 May 2017, 8:00 am
Compare United States v. [read post]
8 Dec 2015, 7:22 pm
However, the answer was swallowed by additional questions, and remained for the United States to deal with more fully. [read post]
25 Jun 2014, 2:19 am
BUNN, Appellant, v. [read post]
22 Sep 2021, 9:27 am
Family Court granted the foster mother’s petition to be appointed kinship guardian of the child. [read post]
21 Oct 2024, 7:53 am
In Oklahoma v. [read post]
8 Oct 2019, 3:41 am
His appeal was denied by the 11th Circuit, but Bostock’s attorneys argued the circuit’s precedents conflicted with two United States Supreme Court decisions: Price Waterhouse v. [read post]
22 Apr 2021, 5:20 pm
Where there is no appeal of right, the State may petition for writ of certiorari to obtain review of the trial court’s grant of the MAR. [read post]
30 Nov 2011, 3:58 pm
A new case from the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit, US Airways, Inc. v. [read post]
16 May 2022, 8:34 am
Customs and Border Protection, blood plasma companies challenged an alleged change in CBP policy that resulted in Mexican plasma donors being denied entrance to the United States using B-1 business visitor visas. [read post]
28 Jun 2021, 11:50 am
They granted a petition filed by Pankajkumar Patel, a citizen of India who came to the United States without authorization nearly 30 years ago. [read post]
27 Jan 2017, 12:52 pm
United States, 16-5454. [read post]
19 Mar 2010, 10:27 am
Duxbury v. [read post]
8 Jan 2019, 3:57 am
” At Crime & Consequences, Kent Scheidegger writes that United States v. [read post]
15 Jan 2020, 4:11 am
United States, which stems from the “Bridgegate” controversy in New Jersey and involves the extent to which federal fraud statutes cover the politically motivated acts of public officials, for this blog, in a post that first appeared at Howe on the Court. [read post]
9 Nov 2016, 12:26 pm
In Constantino v. [read post]
19 Dec 2016, 1:18 pm
United States v. [read post]
17 Feb 2016, 9:20 am
Lee, Director, United States Patent and Trademark Office, No. 15-326 I/P Engine, Inc. v. [read post]
6 May 2022, 6:10 am
In 1977, in GTE Sylvania, the Courtheld that vertical customer and territorial restraints should be judged under the rule of reason.[17] In 1979, in BMI, it held that a blanket license issued by a clearinghouse of copyright owners that set a uniform price and prevented individual negotiation with licensees was a necessary precondition for the product and was thus subject to the rule of reason.[18] In 1984, in Jefferson Parish, the Court rejected automatic application of the per se rule to tying.[19]… [read post]
