Search for: "State v. South" Results 9101 - 9120 of 10,999
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 Jul 2024, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
With that said, the book provides insights relevant to analyzing the Court’s recent decision in Trump v. [read post]
29 Aug 2018, 2:30 am by Lyle Denniston
  In December 1970, the Court split 5-to-4 in the case of Oregon v. [read post]
27 Dec 2020, 9:06 pm by Series of Essays
COVID-19 and Access to Medical Care in the United States May 26, 2020 | Allison K. [read post]
21 Feb 2013, 4:00 am by Administrator
(ret), a leading expert in information age conflict and the law of war, has stated unequivocally that t [read post]
31 Oct 2008, 11:53 am
You can separately subscribe to the Pharma & Biotech edition of the IP Think Tank Global Week in Review by subscribing by email, or selecting ‘all posts’ or ‘Pharma, Biotech & Chem’ for the RSS option at the Subscribe page: [duncanbucknell.com]   Highlights this week included: Oxytrol (Oxybutynin) - US: Watson files patent infringement lawsuit against Barr over application to market generic Oxytrol; Barr challenges Oxytrol patent… [read post]
9 Apr 2010, 12:44 pm
Professor Ann Bartow (Uni of South Carolina), questioned the practice of pixillating trade marks on garments worn by persons arrested for various offences. [read post]
7 Jan 2015, 10:54 am by Frankl & Kominsky, P.A.
The South Florida wrongful death attorneys at Frankl & Kominsky have many years of experiences litigating before state and federal courts and are prepared to deal with the various issues that may arise. [read post]
13 Aug 2012, 5:56 am by Second Circuit Civil Rights Blog
The district court granted summary judgment, holding that plaintiff could not prove his case under the demanding multi-part test under Zahorik v. [read post]
20 Apr 2012, 1:22 am
 It appears to him that this decision finally rids us of University of New South Wales v Moorhouse [1975] HCA 26, one of the world's all-time worst copyright decisions in which it was held that, by making available a photocopy machine in its library for the use of students, a university was liable for authorising copyright infringement. [read post]