Search for: "Strong v. State"
Results 9101 - 9120
of 14,277
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
31 Dec 2019, 12:41 pm
As the title of Ovid's work, late 14c., Metamorphoseos, from Latin Metamorphoses (plural).transform (v.)mid-14c., "change the form of" (transitive), from Old French transformer (14c.), from Latin transformare "change in shape, metamorphose," from trans "across, beyond" (see trans-) + formare "to form" (see form (v.)). [read post]
30 Apr 2012, 11:51 am
Schutz Container Systems, Inc. v. [read post]
8 Oct 2011, 12:57 pm
Crawford v. [read post]
8 Oct 2022, 7:35 am
See Farah v. [read post]
24 Feb 2017, 3:37 pm
Interestingly, however, Blacklock’s instead chose to appeal the $65,000 costs award in which Judge Barnes stated:[7] …I also reject the Plaintiff's argument that this case raised "strong public interest considerations". [read post]
24 Feb 2017, 3:37 pm
Interestingly, however, Blacklock’s instead chose to appeal the $65,000 costs award in which Judge Barnes stated:[7] …I also reject the Plaintiff's argument that this case raised "strong public interest considerations". [read post]
Medical Treatment Patent Claims Held Patentable Subject Matter Under the Alice/Mayo Section 101 Test
30 Apr 2019, 7:10 pm
V. [read post]
12 Mar 2020, 1:48 am
In line with Lord Justice Jacob’s point in Actavis v Merck, the Court of Appeal stated that – in certain circumstances – there is nothing inventive about routinely-taken steps even if the actual outcome had not been predicted. [read post]
3 Sep 2024, 11:30 am
Brussels Court of Appeal, 30 January 2023, Biogen v. [read post]
17 Jan 2023, 6:30 am
Thus, for example, Justice Thomas (in his concurrence in United States v. [read post]
12 Oct 2011, 3:00 pm
Maples v. [read post]
29 Oct 2018, 5:36 am
True, Sir Philip can afford expensive lawyers, but on any view this was no longer a David v Goliath case. [read post]
23 Nov 2011, 5:50 am
She handed him her Illinois state identification card, which he took to his vehicle. [read post]
20 Dec 2009, 1:58 pm
(I have taken the quote directly from Berger v. [read post]
20 Jan 2016, 12:48 pm
There seemed to be two major threads of argument in Nebraska v. [read post]
2 Apr 2015, 10:23 am
This is Shari’s last week at EFF, as she is moving with her family out of state. [read post]
2 Sep 2022, 5:01 am
"[1] Indeed, as noted above, the right of access to court records[2]—and, in the view of many courts, the right of access to parties' names—is a "clear and strong First Amendment interest. [read post]
24 May 2010, 10:49 pm
(IP finance) Withdrawing patent applications – a matter of priority (IPKat) United States US General U.S. [read post]
24 Jun 2024, 10:26 am
” In its petition for certiorari, DG argued that the Fourth Circuit’s decision conflicts with United States v. [read post]
4 Apr 2011, 2:29 am
The Court’s Priority Policy states that the application will be ranked. [read post]
