Search for: "York v York" Results 9101 - 9120 of 51,499
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
6 Oct 2020, 4:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
Rather, said the court, "[t]he board correctly determined that [Police Officer's] injury was not caused by an accident as defined in the New York City Administrative Code and applicable case law.Citing Lichtenstein v Board of Trustees of Police Pension Fund of Police Department of City of New York, 57 NY2d 1010, the Appellate Division observed that "not every line-of-duty injury will support an award of accidental disability retirement [and] an injury which… [read post]
6 Oct 2020, 4:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
Rather, said the court, "[t]he board correctly determined that [Police Officer's] injury was not caused by an accident as defined in the New York City Administrative Code and applicable case law.Citing Lichtenstein v Board of Trustees of Police Pension Fund of Police Department of City of New York, 57 NY2d 1010, the Appellate Division observed that "not every line-of-duty injury will support an award of accidental disability retirement [and] an injury which… [read post]
6 Oct 2020, 12:33 am by Giesela Ruehl
George Bermann (Columbia Law, New York, USA); on panel three: Melanie Willems (Haynes Boone, London, U.K.) and Prof. [read post]
5 Oct 2020, 12:27 pm by Shea Denning
Based on that information, investigators identified multiple occasions when Pacheco traveled to Georgia and New York. [read post]
5 Oct 2020, 10:50 am by Daniel Nathan
In a closely-watched cryptocurrency case, on September 30, the Southern District of New York ruled in favor of the SEC in SEC v. [read post]
5 Oct 2020, 8:17 am by Natalma M. McKnew
On September 8th, a federal Judge largely agreed with the AGs in a 62 page opinion in New York v. [read post]
5 Oct 2020, 7:03 am by Second Circuit Civil Rights Blog
The trial court took away that verdict, and now the case has been handed off the New York Court of Appeals to decide a tricky state law question.The case is Ferreira v. [read post]
5 Oct 2020, 4:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
 The Appellate Division unanimously affirmed the Supreme Court's dismissal of Plaintiff's petition.Citing  Matter of Pepin v New York City Dept. of Educ., 148 AD3d 443, the Appellate Division held that DOE:1. [read post]
5 Oct 2020, 4:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
 The Appellate Division unanimously affirmed the Supreme Court's dismissal of Plaintiff's petition.Citing  Matter of Pepin v New York City Dept. of Educ., 148 AD3d 443, the Appellate Division held that DOE:1. [read post]
4 Oct 2020, 9:01 pm by Neil Cahn
Dollinger answered in his September 18, 2020 opinion in Matthew A. v. [read post]