Search for: "Cross v. State"
Results 9121 - 9140
of 16,710
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 Dec 2013, 1:27 pm
This is a perspective that also conflates public and private law views of entities, be they states or corporations. [read post]
26 Dec 2013, 11:12 am
Law No. 94-V does not appoint a central data protection authority; instead, each state agency is expected to supervise data protection practices within the industry or government sector for which it is responsible. [read post]
26 Dec 2013, 9:18 am
That all changed once Commonwealth v. [read post]
26 Dec 2013, 8:45 am
It denied cross-motions for summary judgment filed by the EEOC and the employer on the Pregnancy Discrimination Act claim (EEOC v Greystar Management Services LP, December 18, 2013, Hollander, E). [read post]
26 Dec 2013, 5:01 am
Timex Group USA, Inc. v. [read post]
25 Dec 2013, 6:16 am
But under cross-examination, [he] conceded he was unsure how much time passed before Peoples entered. [read post]
20 Dec 2013, 5:25 pm
The United States Supreme Court in Jones v. [read post]
20 Dec 2013, 11:03 am
Officials Respond to EU Concerns Over #SafeHarbor Data Transfer Program http://ow.ly/rR9D2 #EUDataP EU-US ‘Safe Harbour’ under threat as US castigates EU Parliament over Snowden http://ow.ly/rTXwR #safeharbor #EUDataP Facebook posts and Free Speech Police Officer’s Facebook Post Criticizing Her Boss Isn’t Protected Speech Graziosi v. [read post]
20 Dec 2013, 10:55 am
Case citation: New York v. [read post]
20 Dec 2013, 6:05 am
U.S. v. [read post]
20 Dec 2013, 2:27 am
The judgments in R (Chester) v Secretary of State for Justice; R (McGeogh) v The Lord President of the Council and Another (Scotland) [2013] UKSC 63 were handed down in October 2013. [read post]
19 Dec 2013, 6:23 pm
(Chambers v. [read post]
19 Dec 2013, 7:07 am
(Canada) v. [read post]
18 Dec 2013, 5:40 pm
The court stayed further proceedings pending final disposition in State v. [read post]
18 Dec 2013, 12:46 pm
” In 2000, the Supreme Court of the United States in its decision in Troxel v. [read post]
18 Dec 2013, 4:30 am
It is a criminal case called U.S. v. [read post]
17 Dec 2013, 11:57 pm
[v] (The apparent search for pockets is reflected in the naming of third parties as well. [read post]
17 Dec 2013, 7:07 am
Eagle v. [read post]
17 Dec 2013, 1:49 am
Samsung points to the January 2011 Federal Circuit decision in Uniloc v. [read post]
17 Dec 2013, 12:05 am
Instead, on appeal the DC Circuit takes precedent seriously and tries to square the NSA surveillance program with United States v. [read post]
