Search for: "Defendants A-F" Results 9121 - 9140 of 29,832
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 Feb 2011, 12:20 pm by Christy Unger
Brown, No. 09-3643, the Third Circuit affirmed the District Court’s opinion granting the defendant’s motion to suppress a sample of his DNA pursuant to Franks v. [read post]
17 Nov 2011, 8:18 am by Alain Leibman
” The Fourth Circuit held in Blair, which involved an attorney-defendant who actively attempted to launder known drug proceeds, that since Caplin & Drysdale employed broad language in stripping away a defendant’s right to use criminal proceeds to hire counsel -- albeit in the forfeiture setting -- the Sixth Amendment as interpreted by the Supreme Court left no defense under Section 1957(f) to an attorney charged with laundering in the form of directing fee… [read post]
16 Mar 2011, 12:15 am by Rita Zhao
by Michael Diaz Jr. and Carlos F. [read post]
17 Mar 2016, 6:20 am by Rebecca Tushnet
Inc., 654 F.3d 1179 (11th Cir. 2011) (declining to consider claims for unfair competition and false designation of origin under §43(a)(1)(A) because the defendant did not have enforceable rights in a mark). [read post]
5 Nov 2013, 2:58 pm
Correction Law § 168–f(2)(a), (b) and (c), and § 168–f(4). [read post]
22 Feb 2018, 3:56 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
The fact that defendants, for economic or strategic reasons, chose not to hire an expert on the issue, and, by plaintiffs own admission in the complaint (,-f ,-f 12, 15), did little to pursue the defective product theory, does not alter the analysis. [read post]
28 Apr 2011, 12:52 pm by admin
Co., 592 F.3d 687  (5th Cir. 2010), a defending insurer is entitled to subrogation against a non-defending insurer for defenses costs. [read post]
9 Jul 2011, 8:05 am
Ellis, 501 F.3d 958, 961 (8th Cir. 2007) (a protective frisk is justified if officer had reasonable suspicion that criminal activity is afoot). [read post]