Search for: "Fail v. State" Results 9121 - 9140 of 66,266
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 Aug 2021, 6:28 am by Michael Geist
In fact, the unanimous court made it clear it disagreed with the analysis, stating “there are some significant jurisprudential problems with those aspects of their judgments that warrant comment. [read post]
2 Aug 2021, 1:14 pm by Daniel F. Bernard
The act applies to all employers in the state regardless of size, with the exception of state and government employers. [read post]
2 Aug 2021, 6:54 am by Cinthia Macie
Facebook, Inc., available at: gov.uscourts.dcd.224921.73.0.pdf (courtlistener.com) & Opinion in State of New York et. al. v. [read post]
2 Aug 2021, 6:39 am by John Jascob
Affirming the ruling below, a Tenth Circuit panel held that the plaintiffs failed to establish any of the Gartenberg factors for showing that the fees charged to the Great-West mutual funds were disproportionately and unreasonably large in relationship to the defendants’ services (Obeslo v. [read post]
2 Aug 2021, 6:12 am by Casey Lide
If a State fails to submit an application for funds by the applicable deadline, a political subdivision or consortium of political subdivisions may submit an application in its place. [read post]
1 Aug 2021, 10:29 am by Ben Allen
The Court held the district court correctly analyzed the four-factor test for granting a motion to withdraw as set out in United States v. [read post]
1 Aug 2021, 10:20 am by Michael DeRose
Notably, the topic of delayed IA investigations was touched on in a well-known Superior Court case entitled Aristizibal v. [read post]
1 Aug 2021, 6:34 am by John Hochfelder
Defendants argued that there was no malpractice and, alternatively, that the amount awarded was excessive but in Bacchus-Sirju v. [read post]
31 Jul 2021, 11:33 am by Josh Blackman
On Thursday, a Second Circuit panel declined to resolve this issue in United States v. [read post]
31 Jul 2021, 11:02 am by Josh Blackman
One year later, the Supreme Court decided Mazars v. [read post]