Search for: "Grant v. State"
Results 9121 - 9140
of 68,544
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
30 May 2007, 3:52 am
[A]ny grant of use immunity to the plaintiffs would have been duplicative. [read post]
28 Sep 2007, 1:38 pm
The petition highlighted the circuit split between the Ninth Circuit's Miller case and the Second Circuit's holding that no showing of intent is required for a defendant to invoke a return-of-capital defense (U.S. v. [read post]
25 Oct 2015, 9:33 am
Additional Resources: Stekr v. [read post]
22 Jan 2014, 12:34 pm
People v. [read post]
6 Jun 2024, 7:14 am
See, e.g., Industrial Services Group, Inc. v. [read post]
29 Jul 2013, 3:54 pm
United States v. [read post]
30 Jul 2019, 12:37 pm
This contrasts with Moore v. [read post]
6 Dec 2010, 7:37 am
The following cases were granted this morning: Title: American Electric Power Co., Inc. v. [read post]
7 Nov 2008, 6:56 am
If the Petitioner acted in a manner consistent with his existing constitutional rights relative to the care and safeguarding of his pistol, the State of New York may not diminish such other rights as he may otherwise possess or have been previously granted solely on the basis that some provision of State law ... dictates that he behave differently in derogation of his Second Amendment Rights. [read post]
30 Jun 2014, 7:31 am
Donald Yeaples and Deborah Yeaples v. [read post]
26 Jun 2017, 7:59 pm
On its face, Trinity Lutheran Church v. [read post]
24 Nov 2021, 8:33 am
Sewell v. [read post]
30 Mar 2020, 7:02 am
Vanda v. [read post]
13 Jul 2020, 11:42 am
Bell v. [read post]
20 Apr 2010, 2:51 am
In Grunstein v. [read post]
19 Apr 2018, 11:37 pm
The question thus posed to the CPVO was whether state funding could have an impact on the grant of a compulsory license. [read post]
25 May 2007, 11:31 pm
See United States v. [read post]
16 Sep 2014, 11:57 am
In Gallon v. [read post]
16 Jan 2009, 4:00 am
Compagnie Gervais Danone v. [read post]
1 Dec 2014, 8:19 am
Appellate History The Administrative Court ruled in favour of the Respondents and granted an order declaring that the Order in Council which led to Royal Assent of the 2010 Law was unlawful. [read post]