Search for: "In Interest of C."
Results 9121 - 9140
of 42,088
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Mar 2020, 11:01 am
Several members of Congress have recently expressed interest in revising 47 U.S.C. [read post]
9 Mar 2020, 10:26 am
CMS can revoke Medicare billing privileges if a provider, supplier or any owner or managing employee was convicted of a Federal or State felony (within the preceding 10 years) that CMS determines is detrimental to the best interests of the Medicare program and its beneficiaries. [read post]
9 Mar 2020, 10:26 am
Under 42 CFR Sec. 424.535(a) (3), CMS can revoke Medicare billing privileges if a provider, supplier or any owner or managing employee was convicted of a Federal or State felony (within the preceding 10 years) that CMS determines is detrimental to the best interests of the Medicare program and its beneficiaries. [read post]
9 Mar 2020, 9:33 am
” c. [read post]
9 Mar 2020, 6:36 am
Amendments proposed for specific exemptions would include the following:Rule 506(c). [read post]
9 Mar 2020, 4:00 am
., Religious Dissent and Disestablishment: Church-State Relations in the New American States, 1776-1833 (University of Missouri Press, 2019)).Linda C. [read post]
9 Mar 2020, 4:00 am
He clearly has the background, the knowledge and interest to review candidates for appointment to the bench, both indigenous and otherwise. [read post]
8 Mar 2020, 11:27 am
First C Y Property Mangement Ltd v Babalola. [read post]
8 Mar 2020, 4:00 am
Intitulé : McClelland c. [read post]
7 Mar 2020, 8:24 am
We do not represent government, corporations or large business interests. [read post]
6 Mar 2020, 12:51 pm
C.) [read post]
6 Mar 2020, 11:19 am
The SEC made clear that “[c]elebrities, like anyone else, can be lured into participating (even unknowingly) in a fraudulent scheme. [read post]
6 Mar 2020, 9:40 am
The state’s Department of Public Health has “general supervision of the interests of the health and lives of the people of the State. [read post]
6 Mar 2020, 8:30 am
C-34 and related compliance guidance. [read post]
6 Mar 2020, 6:18 am
There is considerable public interest in executive pay, and in particular its relation to both individual and company performance. [read post]
6 Mar 2020, 6:00 am
According to Griffith, the cases in which federal courts have considered congressional subpoenas in the past (including cases from 1957, 1927 and 1880, among others), have arisen in “three discrete procedural contexts” that differ from this case: (a) prosecutions for criminal contempt of Congress, (b) applications for writs of habeas corpus, and (c) civil suits affecting the rights of private parties. [read post]
6 Mar 2020, 3:45 am
In an op-ed at The Hill, Ryan Owens and Ryan Black discuss a recent survey in which they asked members of the Supreme Court bar for their views on nationwide injunctions, and found that “71 percent of respondents believed the [Supreme C]ourt should step in and clarify the law. [read post]
5 Mar 2020, 11:33 am
Judge Berger concurred in result only, stating that “anyone interested in efficiencies and saving taxpayer dollars should hope the Supreme Court of North Carolina takes advantage of this opportunity to return us to the plain language of [G.S.] 15A-1444(a2). [read post]
5 Mar 2020, 11:24 am
The appeal attempts to resolve the apparent disparity between Article 15(4), permitting the investigation, and Article 53(c), which allows the court discretion in the interest of justice. [read post]
5 Mar 2020, 11:02 am
(Incidentally, it seems to be the trade mark not the product or the trade mark owner that must have the reputation, which is, well, interesting.) [read post]
