Search for: "Light v. United States"
Results 9121 - 9140
of 11,342
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 May 2009, 5:34 pm
State, supra, 744 A.2d 864, 886-889; Lewis v. [read post]
24 Jun 2019, 11:12 am
In Hudson v. [read post]
29 Apr 2024, 8:09 am
Far more interesting has been the effects within the domains of Latin American politics, especially among the CELAC states (Community of Latin American and Caribbean States) including Cuba--the competitor organization to the OAS (Organization of American States) including the United States. [read post]
12 Aug 2021, 7:14 am
Accepting as true Nicklen’s allegations that he licensed the Video to “almost two dozen entities both in the United States and throughout the world,” this factor weighs against fair use. __ Use of content posted to social media has generated many posts on this blog, starting with AFP v. [read post]
23 Sep 2018, 4:07 pm
Surveillance The ECHR case of Big Brother Watch and Others v UK sheds light on the application of the Regulation of Investigatory Powers Act 2000 to GCHQ investigative measures involving the interception of communications. [read post]
19 May 2025, 1:44 am
United States The Cyberlaw Clinic has filed an amicus brief in support of the Attorney General of the state of California, who is defen [read post]
15 Aug 2019, 11:24 pm
The first loan states:I acknowledge that the requested loan is subject to the limitations on dischargeability in bankruptcy contained in Section 523(a)(8) of the United States Bankruptcy Code. [read post]
10 Jun 2018, 4:26 pm
United States Stanford&rsq [read post]
15 Oct 2019, 3:56 pm
These include the preamble to the Constitution Act, 1867 (“a Constitution similar in Principle to that of the United Kingdom”), at least by inference if not explicitly (see, for example, Quong Wing v. [read post]
6 Aug 2018, 9:30 pm
United States, the Court split 5-4 over whether employee stock options are taxable “compensation” under the Railroad Retirement Tax Act. [read post]
29 Nov 2023, 5:10 pm
United States 23-226Issue: Whether a district court must recalculate a movant’s sentencing range as if Sections 2 and 3 of the Fair Sentencing Act of 2010 were in effect at the time of the offense before exercising its discretion to reduce the movant’s sentence for a covered offense under the First Step Act of 2018. [read post]
25 Jul 2023, 5:25 am
The environmental groups in the pipeline litigation have relied heavily on the Supreme Court’s 1872 decision in United States v. [read post]
20 Dec 2019, 1:02 pm
In his opinion, the AG’s doubts were essentially about whether: 1. the safeguards around US surveillance measures are equivalent to those under GDPR, read in light of articles 7 and 8 of the Charter; and 2. the role of the Privacy Ombudsperson can compensate for insufficiencies of the judicial protection afforded to individuals whose data is transferred to the United States. [read post]
14 Nov 2012, 2:06 pm
Chakrabarty, 447 U.S. 303 (1980) (“Chakrabarty“), in light of Mayo Collaborative Services v. [read post]
23 Dec 2007, 9:29 am
Here is an example from Judge Frank Easterbrook's opinion in United States v. [read post]
8 Aug 2010, 7:58 pm
Here is an example from Judge Frank Easterbrook's opinion in United States v. [read post]
20 Nov 2011, 8:06 pm
Here is an example from Judge Frank Easterbrook's opinion in United States v. [read post]
12 Feb 2023, 8:09 am
Here is an example from Judge Frank Easterbrook's opinion in United States v. [read post]
19 Apr 2009, 2:00 pm
Here is an example from Judge Frank Easterbrook's opinion in United States v. [read post]
24 Nov 2024, 6:00 am
Here is an example from Judge Frank Easterbrook's opinion in United States v. [read post]
