Search for: "Line v. Line"
Results 9121 - 9140
of 45,531
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 Jan 2011, 8:00 am
The opening line notes that "[s]hareholders already possess means to address problems with management and boards of directors. [read post]
14 Jun 2012, 8:36 am
To that end, it's well-known line of flashlight products were introduced in 1979 and quickly became best sellers. [read post]
5 May 2011, 12:33 pm
Think I'm just rambling on so you can't easily see the answer in the line after the question, and hence have to come up with an initial answer yourself. [read post]
31 Aug 2010, 12:15 pm
As Smith got in line behind them, he noticed Bullard staring at him. [read post]
14 Jun 2012, 8:36 am
To that end, it's well-known line of flashlight products were introduced in 1979 and quickly became best sellers. [read post]
7 Apr 2010, 11:44 am
Or maybe the historically novel setting of the internet itself results in difficult jurisdictional and other issues that require an era of publication before the resolution of internet sex stings on appeal become as routinized as, say, bank robbery is now.Something interesting to think about.Anyway, for now, here's yet another case where an older guy (this one from Arizona) talks to a "thirteen year old" from the FBI and travels over state lines (to L.A.) to allegedly have… [read post]
2 Apr 2007, 1:51 pm
Judge Kleinfeld's opinion also raises some very good points: one of his best lines (though you gotta read the opinion to understand the context) is his argument that "someone driving his mother, a child of the sixties, to Thanksgiving weekend, and putting her suitcase in the trunk, should not have to open it and go through her clothes" in order to avoid being guilty of possession. [read post]
7 Feb 2012, 12:34 pm
I think it's a much closer case than she makes it out to be, but at the same time, I can also read between the lines. [read post]
3 Jun 2008, 11:33 am
Hence the attempt to establish an alternative limit doesn't work.Here's the random line. [read post]
10 Nov 2014, 9:51 pm
Bottom line -- a classy, confident move. [read post]
1 Apr 2009, 12:38 pm
Hmmm, which line to quote? [read post]
14 Jun 2012, 8:36 am
To that end, it's well-known line of flashlight products were introduced in 1979 and quickly became best sellers. [read post]
21 Mar 2012, 12:26 pm
The district court grants summary judgment to the University of Oregon.The Ninth Circuit reverses.Judge Gould writes an opinion that -- reading between the lines -- hints that his own view is that there probably wasn't actionable discrimination, but nonetheless holds that the evidence from the student was sufficient to get to a jury. [read post]
22 Jan 2007, 12:01 pm
Nonetheless, the use of acquitted conduct in sentencing is sufficiently counterintutive -- at least to Judge Fletcher -- to compel a dissent.Judge Fletcher's dissent has some pretty good lines, and uses Blackstone and others to highlight the significance of a jury's verdict and the dangers that arise from the rejection of that verdict in sentencing. [read post]
17 May 2007, 1:53 am
What is disappointing however, is the towing of a similar line by the police, very much a State appendage. [read post]
3 Aug 2009, 9:14 am
The carport at issue is one that's familiar to anyone who's lived in cheaper apartments in our Great State: the carports consist of a line of open-ended stalls on the first floor of the apartment complex easily accessible to the street. [read post]
31 Dec 2007, 11:35 am
And surprisingly related to Goodfellas, of all movies.The classic line: "Filomena! [read post]
16 Jan 2009, 10:20 am
While authors are usually listed first, with any other judge "joining" the concurrence listed susequently, here, there's no "joining" line, so the opinion is technically written jointly by Judges Nelson and Reinhardt, with the names listed in order of seniority (e.g., with Judge Nelson first). [read post]
22 Dec 2013, 9:57 am
[This post follows up on my previous post on this judgment on this blog.]In Koushal v Naz—the case being touted as one of its worst judgments—a two-judge bench of the Supreme Court recently overturned a 2009 decision of Delhi High Court which had struck down the criminalisation of sodomy by s 377 of the Indian Penal Code 1860 as unconstitutional. [read post]
4 Aug 2011, 4:00 pm
The court cites to AOL v. [read post]
