Search for: "Pass v. State"
Results 9121 - 9140
of 28,443
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
16 May 2018, 4:35 pm
The EU was criticized heavily for its false accusations and Dutch Parliament passed a motion to abolish EU vs Disinfo entirely: the minister of Internal Affairs is tasked with carrying out this motion. [read post]
16 May 2018, 1:03 pm
Supreme Court in Jones v. [read post]
16 May 2018, 11:03 am
See Quality Inns Intern., Inc. v. [read post]
16 May 2018, 7:41 am
” Gitter v. [read post]
16 May 2018, 7:16 am
On the other hand, the Investors’ statutory arguments fail to pass muster. [read post]
16 May 2018, 5:47 am
In Franklin v. [read post]
16 May 2018, 3:00 am
For example, a recent study by an economist at the OECD found that businesses – including corporations and so-called pass-through firms – pay an average of 33 percent of all taxes collected by the leading industrialized nations. [read post]
15 May 2018, 3:43 pm
In the case of State of Vermont v. [read post]
15 May 2018, 12:00 pm
While red states jockey with each other to see who can pass the strictest abortion law in the hope that theirs will be the one a future Supreme Court uses to overturn Roe v. [read post]
15 May 2018, 11:25 am
One of those dots is Chief Justice John Marshall’s 1809 opinion in Bank of the United States v. [read post]
15 May 2018, 7:25 am
It was established case law, in particular in decisions T 714/00 and T 1067/97, that an amendment to a claim by the introduction of a feature originally disclosed only in combination with other features was permissible on condition that the introduced feature was not inextricably linked to other features of the combination, the removal of the omitted features passed the essentiality test, and the overall disclosure justified the generalising isolation of the feature and its introduction… [read post]
15 May 2018, 7:25 am
It was established case law, in particular in decisions T 714/00 and T 1067/97, that an amendment to a claim by the introduction of a feature originally disclosed only in combination with other features was permissible on condition that the introduced feature was not inextricably linked to other features of the combination, the removal of the omitted features passed the essentiality test, and the overall disclosure justified the generalising isolation of the feature and its introduction… [read post]
15 May 2018, 6:32 am
The pioneering case was New York v. [read post]
[Orin Kerr] Byrd v. United States: The Supreme Court Takes a Broad View of Fourth Amendment Standing
15 May 2018, 4:12 am
Carter and Minnesota v. [read post]
14 May 2018, 4:21 pm
On the way, Byrd passed a Pennsylvania State Trooper, who was suspicious of Byrd because he was driving with his hands at the “10 and 2” position. [read post]
14 May 2018, 3:20 pm
Four states were allowed to continue operations that had existed in those states at the time PASPA was passed. [read post]
14 May 2018, 12:04 pm
United States v. [read post]
14 May 2018, 11:52 am
In Gittings v. [read post]
14 May 2018, 9:49 am
United States] and Printz [v. [read post]
14 May 2018, 9:38 am
The US Supreme Court [official website] ruled [opinion, PDF] Monday in Murphy v. [read post]
