Search for: "People v Levelle"
Results 9121 - 9140
of 12,302
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
30 Nov 2011, 8:19 am
Pandit, who took the top job in December 2007, disbanded part of the hybrid team in 2008 and began to wind down the structuring side of the business, the people said. [read post]
30 Nov 2011, 3:56 am
Seinfeld v. [read post]
29 Nov 2011, 4:56 pm
In Louisiana v. [read post]
29 Nov 2011, 10:07 am
Long before Oxford asked me to write this book, I had dissected the Chief Justice John Roberts’s brief in Alaska v. [read post]
28 Nov 2011, 9:02 am
Of particular interest to Episcopalians is the current case in Massachusetts of Gill v. [read post]
28 Nov 2011, 4:02 am
Courts have precluded the use of class actions against drug makers in most cases (see, e.g., Valentino v. [read post]
28 Nov 2011, 3:16 am
We note, however, that such questions were improper (see People v Paul, 229 AD2d 932; People v Paul, 212 AD2d 1020, 1021, lv denied 85 NY2d 912; People v Edwards, 167 AD2d 864, lv denied 77 NY2d 877). [read post]
28 Nov 2011, 1:59 am
When pasteurization started to become more mainstream early last century, some people were suspicious of the technology. [read post]
23 Nov 2011, 3:48 am
Harry Blackmun had his epiphany back in 1994, in Callins v. [read post]
22 Nov 2011, 9:00 pm
Elmore v. [read post]
22 Nov 2011, 8:27 pm
Today in Contracts, I taught Vokes v. [read post]
22 Nov 2011, 6:42 pm
For instance, in Kyllo v. [read post]
22 Nov 2011, 12:12 pm
Baristas: Many people claim that neither type of patent insurance is a good investment. [read post]
22 Nov 2011, 9:00 am
In the 1982 Supreme Court case, Plyler v. [read post]
22 Nov 2011, 4:57 am
See Cefalu v. [read post]
21 Nov 2011, 2:20 pm
That idea was turned on its head in United States v. [read post]
21 Nov 2011, 1:16 pm
Counteracting the 2010 Citizens United case and the 1976 Buckley v. [read post]
21 Nov 2011, 10:43 am
Hohenberg et al. v. [read post]
20 Nov 2011, 7:20 pm
People v Wheeler, 59 AD3d 1007, lv denied 12 NY3d 711). [read post]
20 Nov 2011, 8:24 am
The Coca-Cola Company v. [read post]
