Search for: "STATE V. POWERS"
Results 9121 - 9140
of 41,395
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 Jul 2008, 5:18 pm
In 2006, the Supreme Court decided Hamdan v. [read post]
8 Jan 2009, 4:30 am
Deehan v. [read post]
28 Apr 2023, 9:10 am
For example, a recent Texas car accident case, Sibel Onasis Ferrer v. [read post]
10 Mar 2021, 3:59 am
Rhode Island’s junior senator, Sheldon Whitehouse, was a United States Attorney and state attorney general, so it’s not unreasonable to assume he’s got a modest functional knowledge of separation of powers. [read post]
13 Dec 2011, 7:25 am
(citing State v. [read post]
16 Aug 2017, 7:27 am
Christie v. [read post]
29 Nov 2017, 12:00 pm
See, e.g., Zivotofsky v. [read post]
17 Oct 2022, 3:52 pm
This restriction on state power is commonly referred to as the “dormant Commerce Clause. [read post]
19 Nov 2007, 11:43 am
PSEG Power New York, Inc. v. [read post]
16 Mar 2016, 2:31 pm
Briggs, 229 U.S. 82, 88 (1913)). [4] United States v. [read post]
4 Nov 2010, 3:00 pm
As President Obama said yesterday, EPA is carrying out its responsibilities under the Clean Air Act and the Supreme Court’s decision in Massachusetts v. [read post]
28 Mar 2012, 3:02 pm
It has already proved it has no problem shunning precedent or being out-of-touch, for example see Citizens United v. [read post]
23 Jun 2008, 8:45 pm
EPA's Region V requesting justification for changes made to the State's air pollution control plan. [read post]
10 Apr 2017, 11:25 am
One example: a state AG is elected only by his/her states’ voters but this law would give them increased powers to force Internet intermediaries to make changes across their national or even global service that will affect residents who never could vote for–or against–that AG. [read post]
9 Apr 2024, 7:03 am
Quasi-Judicial Powers. [read post]
2 Dec 2010, 8:29 pm
As the Court explained in United States v. [read post]
19 Sep 2011, 4:00 am
Louis IM & S v. [read post]
20 Feb 2019, 2:44 pm
Kelo v. [read post]
9 Nov 2020, 6:16 pm
In NFIB v. [read post]
4 Dec 2009, 8:20 am
The Court did grant the State's motion to particpate in the upcoming oral argument in City of Dallas v. [read post]
